Muzman on 22/5/2008 at 03:09
California and most of the western world, apparently.
Stitch on 22/5/2008 at 03:44
Quote Posted by a flower in hell
Note: Let's not turn this into a "guns r bad mmkay" thread, it was just the most obvious thing that California beats up on and was the easiest way to make the comparison that California lawmakers are hypocrites.
Guns and buttsex certainly are flip sides of the same coin.
The_Raven on 22/5/2008 at 05:13
Quote Posted by fett
OHMYGOD. Do I have to spell this out? There is NO POOP in the vagina people! Bacteria in the digestive tract better very well stay there, because if it ends up in other parts of the body. Liver failure, kidney failure, colon cancer, etc. etc. etc.
fett, in case you missed it, I did say you had a perfectly valid point. My counter point was simply that proper education and mentality can greatly reduce the risks associated with anal sex. If you use a condom, and do not use the same one for vaginal penetration after anal sex; post-anal fellatio; or whatever the hell kids are doing these days, then I really do not have a problem with it. Is it a higher risk behavior than vaginal intercourse? Yes. Are there very real legitimate risks of bacterial transfer, potential damage, and increased risk factors for various diseases? Yes. Do I believe that if two people are responsible about it, they can decrease the potential risk to a manageable level? Yes.
<HR>
Quote Posted by Stitch
Guns and buttsex certainly are flip sides of the same coin.
Yeah, because all the gay lobbyists want to take away our guns. :p
Fafhrd on 22/5/2008 at 05:21
Quote Posted by Stitch
Guns and buttsex certainly are flip sides of the same coin.
God knows I don't enjoy anal nearly as much if I'm not firing off twin six-guns like a cowboy.
PigLick on 22/5/2008 at 05:46
that would indeed be crazy anal
Epos Nix on 22/5/2008 at 10:44
Quote:
My counter point was simply that proper education and mentality can greatly reduce the risks associated with anal sex.
So what do you propose? Anal Intercourse 101 in high school now?
jay pettitt on 22/5/2008 at 11:23
Hell no, that would be a taboo and you don't mess with taboos.
SD on 22/5/2008 at 11:55
Quote Posted by Epos Nix
So what do you propose? Anal Intercourse 101 in high school now?
I think they already have that one in Catholic schools.
fett on 22/5/2008 at 12:28
Quote Posted by The_Raven
fett, in case you missed it, I did say you had a perfectly valid point. My counter point was simply that proper education and mentality can greatly reduce the risks associated with anal sex. If you use a condom, and do not use the same one for vaginal penetration after anal sex; post-anal fellatio; or whatever the hell kids are doing these days, then I really do not have a problem with it. Is it a higher risk behavior than vaginal intercourse? Yes. Are there very real legitimate risks of bacterial transfer, potential damage, and increased risk factors for various diseases? Yes. Do I believe that if two people are responsible about it, they can decrease the potential risk to a manageable level? Yes.
<HR>
Agreed. :thumb:
TTK12G3 on 22/5/2008 at 13:40
Quote Posted by Epos Nix
So what do you propose? Anal Intercourse 101 in high school now?
How about instead of the two-minute abstinence lecture, give proper sex education....perhaps with the two-minute abstinence lecture ?
