Nicker on 18/7/2010 at 12:16
Less fury / more furries.
Aerothorn on 20/7/2010 at 03:09
Quote Posted by ZylonBane
Aero Glass really does look atrocious though. You don't see crap like that on actual professionally-designed layouts.
I'm pretty sure that Aero Glass, by default, was designed by professionals.
New Horizon on 20/7/2010 at 03:50
When I got my new laptop a few months ago, I fully intended to wipe it clean and put XP on it. I messed around in Win 7 for a few minutes and it won me over. It's a fine OS. Firefox is also still a great browser, not sure what the complaints are about, it has always been rather effortless for me to customize it to my needs.
ZylonBane on 20/7/2010 at 17:19
Quote Posted by Aerothorn
I'm pretty sure that Aero Glass, by default, was designed by professionals.
Professional graphic designers, I very much doubt.
JediKorenchkin on 20/7/2010 at 18:15
Quote Posted by New Horizon
When I got my new laptop a few months ago, I fully intended to wipe it clean and put XP on it. I messed around in Win 7 for a few minutes and it won me over. It's a fine OS. Firefox is also still a great browser, not sure what the complaints are about, it has always been rather effortless for me to customize it to my needs.
I recently switched over to Google Chrome and find it considerably faster than Firefox with essentially the same functionality / customisation.
Koki on 21/7/2010 at 05:40
Quote Posted by Sulphur
I'm not about to defend that, or anything else about that, but if you decide to have your penis/pussy/asshole out in the open I wouldn't have a problem with that at all.
I am
honored, but the point was about the drawn character. Generally when you want to bother with covering your genitalia and boobs you start with the former.
Kolya on 21/7/2010 at 14:23
If you understand the different moral codes about showing naked animals vs. naked humans, then it's really not surprising. Of course in a universe where furries actually would exist, the morals might get modified to include all sentient beings in the taboo. But obviously that's not what the artist wanted to depict, for reasons best left unclear. Much as the question why you so readily identify with it.
Sulphur on 21/7/2010 at 14:27
Quote Posted by Koki
I am
honored, but the point was about the drawn character. Generally when you want to bother with covering your genitalia and boobs you start with the former.
I wasn't talking about you per se, I was talking about actual people in general.
And, uh, it's a drawn character? It's not real. So who really gives a fuck if it approximates reality to any degree when it
also comes replete with a complete set of mammalian sex organs from both genders?
Also damn you for making me argue about chakats. And that's
you the-person-I'm-quoting you.
Koki on 22/7/2010 at 05:19
Quote Posted by Sulphur
And, uh, it's a drawn character? It's not real.
Yeah, well, unlike you I like when stuff makes sense.
And I'm not a biologist, but I don't think having both male and female reproductive organs in one organism is something impossible. Evolutionary impossible, maybe, buy not biologically.
Sulphur on 22/7/2010 at 06:34
Not in typical mammalian physiology. Maybe if you're an earthworm, and when it comes to you Kokes, who knows.
And yeah, the basic foundation of an imaginary species, one that was created as an extension of what is essentially wish fulfilment, makes a whole lotta sense by its lonesome.
Keep arguing.
