cyclops1101 on 12/9/2009 at 15:26
Thanks Bikerdude, you have put my mind at rest :thumb:
I believe the Overclockers will have a purchase from me sometime in the future :cheeky:
Quote:
If you want to build your own system I can help you do that, as I will cherry pick the parts you need and factor in the best bang for buck ratio - which the overclockers systems aren't quite doing to my satisfaction.
I will let you know, Ive got some serious months of saving to do (I need a better job!) and my mind may be subject to change in that time but I will let you know once I decide/have cash!.
Thanks Bikerdude you have been most excellent :thumb:
mudi on 12/9/2009 at 16:11
^^ Ha, that "requirements test" program fails me on every product because it thinks my operating system is "Microsoft (Build 7100)" which it doesn't recognize as XP or Vista. Then to add to the silliness, it recommends I buy a pre-order of Windows 7 to fix the problem. :rolleyes:
Enchantermon on 12/9/2009 at 16:27
That's weird. I'm guessing you have Windows 7, eh? It's still helpful for testing the rest of your system, though.
bikerdude on 12/9/2009 at 17:36
Quote Posted by cyclops1101
I will let you know, Ive got some serious months of saving to do (I need a better job!) and my mind may be subject to change in that time but I will let you know once I decide/have cash!.Thanks Bikerdude you have been most excellent :thumb:
your welcome, btw dont forget there is also the option of upgrading yourt current pc, which will be a bit cheaper. Can you post some pics along with make and model of the various parts..? I can then have a scout and see what can be upgraded..
cyclops1101 on 12/9/2009 at 20:15
Quote:
your welcome, btw dont forget there is also the option of upgrading yourt current pc, which will be a bit cheaper. Can you post some pics along with make and model of the various parts..? I can then have a scout and see what can be upgraded..
Thats a great offer, thanks, but I really have no plans to upgrade my old system, mostly because I have a load of old adventure games that require an old system such as mine. Less hassle in the long run, i guess. Thanks tho :)
Bjossi on 13/9/2009 at 02:47
Quote Posted by cyclops1101
I note that the processor required is 3Ghz whereas the Quad core is 2.33 Ghz. Since Im a total noob Would this computer play the game at full speed and quality? or do I need a better processor.
It is not possible to directly compare clock frequencies of two different processor families.
The reason for this is that different processor manufacturers not only use different technology for maximizing the work that gets done per cycle but they also change/improve it from generation to generation. So for example a 4 GHz Pentium 4 gets easily slaughtered by a single 2.67 GHz i7 core because the latter has the edge in terms of technology (it is newer, simply put). And if you thought the P4 didn't stand a chance there, imagine if all 4 cores of the i7 were working together in a perfect work distribution.
Basically what you have to take into account when buying a processor are 3 things; clock frequency, generation and amount of cores. For example if you got a processor of a newer generation than what is stated in the requirements, you don't really have to worry about the stated clock frequency numbers at all.
I would say a 3 GHz P4 requirement is awfully modest, that processor family was a piece of crap even at its time of release. You're more than covered for a smooth sailing in modern gaming if you buy a quad core, whether it is Phenom, C2Q or i7.
cyclops1101 on 13/9/2009 at 16:06
Nice info, Thanks. Something tells me I will be buying newer processors. :thumb:
Quote:
You're more than covered for a smooth sailing in modern gaming if you buy a quad core, whether it is Phenom, C2Q or i7.
I noticed you mentioned a quad core Phenom but the one im looking at currently is a:
AMD Phenom II X3 Tri Core 720 2.80GHz @ 3.30GHz (Socket AM3)
How would this processor measureup to a Phenom quad core. Would it be worth the extra money? and do you know if they are both 64bit processors??
Kind Thanks :thumb:
bikerdude on 13/9/2009 at 17:34
Quote Posted by cyclops1101
How would this processor measureup to a Phenom quad core. Would it be worth the extra money? and do you know if they are both 64bit processors??
Go for the tricore, 1. it runs faster in some games, 2. its cheaper.
cyclops1101 on 14/9/2009 at 16:19
Quote:
Go for the tricore, 1. it runs faster in some games, 2. its cheaper.
Yeah, if it runs evey game at top notch and is friendly on the pocket. I shall make it mine :ebil: Eventually :erg:
But say if I wanted to upgrade to a future AMD Processor, Would I be able to?
Since the processor is overclocked would this interfere with future processors being plugged onto the motherboard. Would I somehow have to tell the computer not to overclock a new processor or could I just plug and play, so to say?
Bjossi on 14/9/2009 at 16:38
The processor has to be compatible with the socket. So for example I wouldn't be able to plug my old socket 939 AMD processor into a socket AM3 motherboard. Then there is the question if the current power supply got what it takes to power the new processor, but this is usually not an issue since any major upgrade requires a change in socket most of the time.