Jason Moyer on 20/10/2016 at 14:34
Quote Posted by Brethren
I wonder if he'll post here anymore once Trump gets stomped on election day.
One can only hope.
Goldmoon Dawn on 20/10/2016 at 15:55
Oh really!
What do you care, you dont even bother reading the threads anyway...
Vivian on 20/10/2016 at 15:58
Goldmoon you are obsessed with people reading the threads. And last time you kicked off about it you made yourself look like a tit. Give it a rest eh?
nbohr1more on 20/10/2016 at 17:08
Quote Posted by Renzatic
His refusal to even entertain the possibility that Russia was behind the hacks, claiming that our entire intelligence apparatus is wrong on that matter, then trying to spin it all with a "I don't know the guy", didn't help at all.
The fact his own vice presidential candidate has gone on record saying that Russia is involved in some shape, form, or fashion surely won't do him any favors.
He really shit the bucket on this one. He was weak on the first, strong on the second, and reduced to an on-the-defensive excuse generator for this one.
What is more likely:
Russian hacks?
DNC Leaker:
Inline Image:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/01/18/36C83CC200000578-0-image-a-1_1470071579344.jpgHis name was Seth Rich, and he "died mysteriously". Nobody has claimed the reward for identifying his killer yet.
I wonder why...
Both candidates did a horrible job. Vote Jill Stein!
Renzatic on 20/10/2016 at 17:46
What's more likely?
That a Democrat working from within the party hacked a bunch of emails that show evidence no more damning than the fact that the DNC higher ups are occasionally snarky and rude? That he was assassinated for his effort, and now both the Democrats and Republicans are blaming the Russians for the hack to distract us?
Or...
That the Russians hacked us basically as a giant troll, and now we're all blaming them for it, Democrats and Republicans alike, minus Donald Trump and his contingent?
Your conspiracy theory might have some legs if the Podesta emails and Clinton's Wall Street speeches were as controversial as, say, the Snowden leaks. But they weren't. The former was more embarrassing than condemning. The latter, merely someone discussing current world politics with a bunch of investors.
So yeah, I'd say that a foreign actor thumbing their noses at us is the more likely cause than a little conspiracy cover up that both parties are playing part in.
Goldmoon Dawn on 20/10/2016 at 17:53
Quote Posted by Vivian
Goldmoon you are obsessed with people reading the threads.
Dont know why you bother to invoke, as the song remains the same. It is quite ok to post ones hope that someone never posts here again, and it is also ok to suggest that those posting actually read the threads. Also, byte me.
Moving on...
Al_B on 20/10/2016 at 18:28
Quote Posted by Brethren
I wonder if he'll (Vae) post here anymore once Trump gets stomped on election day.
Since he has said he doesn't actually support Trump I'm quite sure he will.
Renzatic on 20/10/2016 at 18:34
The first is a lawyer discussing that he has emails that should've been marked classified on a thumbdrive. The latter makes you want to arch an eyebrow, though there are exceptions to some donators under FARA laws, which might be what they're working at here.
Both are suspicious to some extent, and would warrant a deeper look. Neither are admissions or evidence of outright guilt on the surface.
