Moi Dix Mois on 24/8/2006 at 23:49
If you'd accidentally hit the forward button afterwards you would have found that your message was still intact. Unless that only hapens with Firefox and you're using something else.
edit: fag
Aerothorn on 25/8/2006 at 00:55
That's usually the case, but this time for some reason the message was gone.
Paz on 25/8/2006 at 17:40
(
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/5286690.stm) Whee, another exciting twist.
There shouldn't be any problem with the one-day series now, because that dude certainly isn't going to be umpiring it. Or any other international match, most likely.
I recommend everyone interested read the (
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/5286994.stm) full email text too, actually. The situation isn't QUITE as dodgy/corrupt as the BBC tv news suggested - Hair's approach was still rather stupid and dubious, but a bit less than portrayed.
juman47kl on 26/8/2006 at 07:17
Quote Posted by ercles
The part that I don't get is why Pakistan were refused to be explained how they had been deemed to have tampered with the ball. This lack of communication seems to be the source of the whole shemozzle.
Well this whole thing is a big mess. i agree with this man because when i was watching DH accusing pakisitani cricketers of ball tempering i thought that inzamam should have made the reason right away that if he wants to leave the field or carry on. the only reason he couldn't have done that was lack of his English communication skill(you can guess by my english...:cheeky: )
About the decision of forfeiture, i think darrel hair was right, but if you go with the rules and penalise inzamama, you have to think about DARREL TOO. he gave 5 extra runs too,( you cannot blame an umpire for changing ball as he can do that if he sees ball damaged) which means that he has accused pakistan for BT, for which i am sure he doesn't have any proof.( 28 cameras couldn't pick it out let alone one man). For an umpire of his repute(REMEMBER shoaib, afridi & muralitharan, I DON'T TAKE THE WRONG DISMISSALS AS THEY CAN BE HUMAN ERRORS) i think ICC should throw Darrel out of the elite pannal straight away.
ercles on 26/8/2006 at 09:21
Quote Posted by Paz
(
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/5286690.stm) Whee, another exciting twist.
There shouldn't be any problem with the one-day series now, because that dude certainly isn't going to be umpiring it. Or any other international match, most likely.
I recommend everyone interested read the (
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/5286994.stm) full email text too, actually. The situation isn't QUITE as dodgy/corrupt as the BBC tv news suggested - Hair's approach was still rather stupid and dubious, but a bit less than portrayed.
Well now he has come out and tried to sue the whole world, what a dick
Matthew on 30/8/2006 at 10:36
Really? How odd. Do you have a link? I'm afraid Google is not being helpful at the moment.
AxTng1 on 30/8/2006 at 13:01
ITT WE TALK ABOUT FISHING
fett on 1/9/2006 at 04:29
I get cricket and shuffleboard mixed up. Are they both played by old people, or is it that both put you to sleep?
Either way, the Pakistani's are obviously wrong and are also terrists, so fuck 'em.
Paz on 1/9/2006 at 11:47
Cricket is the one ineptly criticised by people who fear what they don't understand.
In this instance, beauty.
Chimpy Chompy on 2/9/2006 at 10:27
Actually I don't understand Cricket myself.
I fear I'm unfit to call myself an Englishman. :(
