Mr.Duck on 5/4/2006 at 23:05
Quote Posted by Para?noid
--->o--- CUT THREAD HERE
Oh how I wish...
dj_ivocha on 5/4/2006 at 23:18
Quote Posted by foolinabox
About this boy who undressed when men paid him... People grow their children to be obedient and being 13 and in safety of his home, a young man hasnt got enough experience in life to say no. The blame falls solely on those making the request.
I'd think most of the blame is to be directed at his parents for not raising him properly, to be honest. I'm not saying the men who paid him weren't :nono:, mind you.
Quote Posted by Turtle
I have the world's largest collection of my stuff...
Turtle, I want to have your manbabies! :D
Scots Taffer on 5/4/2006 at 23:20
I pretty much agree 100% with Stitch. The rest of you can all just fuck off.
Including henke!
Agent Monkeysee on 6/4/2006 at 02:03
I've got Stitch's back doods :cool:
Epos Nix on 6/4/2006 at 02:18
Quote:
Their bodies may be nice but all you need to do is spend ten seconds talking to one to realize that teens are, in fact, still kids.
This is exactly why I won't distinguish between someone who shares sexual experiences between a 14 year old and one who does so with someone half that age.
Though the question REALLY on my mind now is why was this guy being set up like this in the first place? He must have aroused suspicion at some point so I can only imagine this "girl" wasn't his first. Then again I also look at the staggering amount of evidence they have pointing right at him and think something ain't right. Assuming this guy can still get it up at 70, is he really going to risk his career by giving an abundance of information about himself to someone he doesn't even know while doing something clearly illegal?? Anything's possible, I know... :sweat:
Agent Monkeysee on 6/4/2006 at 03:17
Quote Posted by Epos Nix
This is exactly why I won't distinguish between someone who shares sexual experiences between a 14 year old and one who does so with someone half that age.
You really should. There's a qualitative difference between a 14 yr. old and a 24 yr. old, even if the latter is banging a 50 yr. old.
aguywhoplaysthief on 6/4/2006 at 03:35
Quote Posted by Dia
I wouldn't call an adult male who admires the beauty of a post-pubescent girl a pervert; but if he starts fantasizing obsessively about what he'd like to do to/with her then yes, he's just crossed the line.
But if he fantasized obsessively about a 25-year-old that would be...okay then?
Honestly, I'm not sure what you have a problem with, since you keep changing your language - you started out with saying one thing, and then you add "obsessive", "
a teenager girl" etc. so no one has a clue on exactly what your problem is.
Here's a clear question:
Do you have a problem with someone preferring to fantasizing about women with an "ideal" body (16-19 years old) as opposed to those with a slightly less "ideal" body (20-29), for example?
Quote Posted by Dia
I'm fully aware that there are
some men who feel[...]
Some? Try "most".
I don't think there are many people who think that any male member of the species would be hot for naked grannies unless something fucked up in the environment happened to them in their life that caused that.
Epos Nix on 6/4/2006 at 03:38
Quote:
You really should. There's a qualitative difference between a 14 yr. old and a 24 yr. old, even if the latter is banging a 50 yr. old.
My point was that I personally think anyone who knows better, especially a man as old as Doyle, that tries to convince a 14 year old to strip for him is just as much a pedo as one who does so with a much younger child. That's my personal opinion, regardless of how hawt teens may be and how we are wired. We humans should still have something called 'restraint'. The line divides when these girls mature and no longer think like children.
Stitch on 6/4/2006 at 03:55
I'm going to do something I typically hate and do a play by play here.
Quote Posted by Dia
the sexual attraction of an adult to an adolescent (ie. to someone between the stages of puberty and adulthood).
Then sign up the majority of the male population. Physical attraction is a raw, sexual reaction with guys, even if sex is not even desired. It's just the way we are, really. The difference is when I see a hot teen my main thought is "why the hell did I waste my highschool years rolling twenty sided dice?" whereas when I see a hot 25 year old I think, "I'd cook her breakfast :cool:"
Quote Posted by Dia
Like I said before though, we could split hairs here indefinitely, but I (and millions of other parents) still have a problem with adult males who have serious sexual obsessions with teenaged girls.
But of course. Who could possibly disagree with a statment denouncing adult "sexual obsessions with teenage girls?"
Quote Posted by Dia
As for the rest of your post, I'm pretty much in agreement.
Actually, I think we're probably entirely in agreement and we're just debating semantics at this point.
Truth be told, I don't even really like using the word "attraction" in association with teenage girls as it implies a greater level of intent and action, as if you want to get closer to this person, which is completely inaccurate. I may see a hot teenage girl and think "god DAMN" but it really doesn't extend beyond that. There's no actual attraction to her beyond that initial basic shot of testosterone.
tungsten on 6/4/2006 at 03:58
Quote Posted by Scots_Taffer
Including henke!
Please give me the email adress of your kid. There's no such thing as too young, you know! :eek:
