What overturning Roe v. Wade could mean for birth control access, maternal care

Dia on 25/5/2022 at 16:13

Quote Posted by mopgoblin

So how much force would he, personally, be willing to use to stop abortion?

I don't know about him, but Pro-Forced Birthers have been committing acts of violence against abortion clinics, doctors who've performed abortions and women who've had or are seeking abortions since the early '90s. Don't tempt that nutjob; he sounds like one of those maniacs who would stone women who are trying to enter a Planned Parenthood clinic. What surprises me is that he claims to be a nurse, yet refers to abortions as 'infanticide' (obviously he's one of the more ignorant nurses *smh*). Tell him and other sexist pigs like him that mask-wearing in stores is being made mandatory again or that they HAVE to get a covid vaccination and see how quickly he turns Pro-Choice. But don't tempt him by asking how much force he'd be willing to use to stop abortion, he sounds mentally ill enough to interpret your question as a challenge.

(https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/11/29/us/30abortion-clinic-violence.html)

(https://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/news/a5669/abortion-clinic-protesters/)

uncadonego on 25/5/2022 at 16:37

The biggest load of crap is that it has nothing to do with religion. Who the hell else would make a reference to Moloch? Notice he says he'll never bring God into it, but he gave himself away by referencing the Bible?

Only 22% of the U.S. population is Catholic, but the Supreme Court has been slowly, according to plan, been stuffed with a disproportionate super-majority of Catholics.

Only 15 out of 115 Supreme Court justices have ever been Catholic, but now there are 6 of 9 Catholics on the Court.

Only just a freaky coincidence that Roe is now being overturned.

Nothing having to do with religion at all.

Renzatic on 25/5/2022 at 18:09

Well, if you want a more secular explanation for banning abortion, just look to recent events for a nice example. We need to make abortion illegal to bolster the birthrate in the country, compensating for all the kids we lose in school shootings.

The national supply of newborns must be maintained at all times.

Renzatic on 25/5/2022 at 18:15

You may think me heartless, but you need to realize that I'm only advocating what's best for all of us. The tree of liberty must occasionally be watered with the blood of innocent bystanders.

Starker on 25/5/2022 at 19:17

Being "hard-core pro-life", I'd assume he's also a hardcore supporter of gun regulation and environmental regulations. Anything to preserve life, right? Or maybe this suddenly becomes one of those prices that are not too much to pay for liberty.

Dia on 25/5/2022 at 20:46

Quote Posted by Renzatic

Also, the GOP warmongers (who also hold stocks in our country's major defense contracting companies, i.e., Trump/Raytheon), play the Long Game and know they'll need cannon fodder down the road.

P.S. I'm assuming you were being sarcastic; I wasn't.

Renzatic on 25/5/2022 at 21:24

We need a steady supply of oprhans to fight in our future wars for Jesus!

Starker on 25/5/2022 at 22:21

It's certainly odd that in the US pro-life is the position of a friggin' death cult in any other respect.

bob_doe_nz on 26/5/2022 at 01:12

Quote Posted by Renzatic

We need a steady supply of oprhans to fight in our future wars for Jesus!

But they have to be white and bred in the United States right? No immigrant babies?

Renzatic on 26/5/2022 at 02:35

Quote Posted by bob_doe_nz

But they have to be white and bred in the United States right? No immigrant babies?

NO CHINAMEN, NO IRISH!