furunculus on 27/2/2005 at 10:45
Quote Posted by Komag
That may be the mainstream system that is currently bought by gamers. But the mainstream average PC buyers get onboard video and audio, WAY way less good than a nice 6600GT, more along the lines of a lamo GeForce 4 MX or something like that. And a gig of ram is still rare as well, for most people.
But don't let that stop you. As long as you can hit similar framerates as you get in the OMs, that will work for us! :thumb: Looks very cool BTW, keep it up!
there is no room for onboard graphics with my levels, lol. i estimate the minimum spec to be a 9800Pro/X700Pro from ATI, or a 5900U/6600GT from nVidia.
my last level was pretty demanding as well, considering it was released 18 months ago for Ravenshield: (
http://www.spandex.eclipse.co.uk/UWA_08-17-2003_1.jpg)
but people coped. :)
furunculus on 27/2/2005 at 10:46
Quote Posted by Bho
Whoa! Some of us can bearly run the game, ya know... :(
i know, i'm about to junk my current PC cos it is so slow are running modern apps/games. :(
bloodyzeppelins on 27/2/2005 at 15:30
Quote Posted by furunculus
yup. :D
i know its a lot of BSP, but it runs fine on a 2100+ with 512MB and a GF4Ti4200. in these days where the mainstream system is an A64 3200+ 1024MB and a 6600GT it should not pose a problem. *hopes* :D
- Thats not yours, unless you're the level designer for Nightblade. That shot isn't even from T3Ed...
* nevermind, that is yours. haha, sorry
furunculus on 27/2/2005 at 15:53
i'm not part of the Nightblade team, i just rather fancied making a level for its sneaky style of gameplay, just as i now wish to see it adapted for T3. :)
where did you get confused?
bloodyzeppelins on 27/2/2005 at 16:00
I remember seeing that in the Nightblade forums a long time ago... for some reason, I thought it was their mission. It looks great, by the way.
darkcosmos on 27/2/2005 at 16:33
LOL - I play that level a lot, and never seem to win it :D
Korrow on 27/2/2005 at 18:38
Quote Posted by dracflamloc
Have you tried my instructions and launcher?
Yes, I have. I can open the editor but I can't Run anything that I make.
furunculus on 27/2/2005 at 20:03
Quote Posted by bloodyzeppelins
I remember seeing that in the Nightblade forums a long time ago... for some reason, I thought it was their mission. It looks great, by the way.
lol, np.
i am waiting for a static and texture pack from the nightblade people, until then there isn't much more i can do.
jolynsbass on 27/2/2005 at 21:19
Quote Posted by furunculus
yup. :D
i know its a lot of BSP, but it runs fine on a 2100+ with 512MB and a GF4Ti4200. in these days where the mainstream system is an A64 3200+ 1024MB and a 6600GT it should not pose a problem. *hopes* :D
I'm not so sure, but I wouldn't call 6600GT
mainstream... at least not yet. But I'm sure it will be all too soon. By the way, that castle looks great!
Question : With my not having the game yet(my card is too far below the 6600GT level to be able to play TDS), I don't understand why someone said it would be better to use more static meshes... What exactly is a static mesh and how is it superior to using brushes? And can you see the exact shape of it in the editor(unlike in Dromed, where you could place an object, and only see a big square- NOT helpful) ? I guess I just need to get the game... and a new vid card... :nono:
