Pyrian on 3/7/2007 at 23:56
Quote Posted by daprdan
Your so called argument is damned when you say "I got one sentence into that".
Their so-called argument was damned in the first sentence. If the first sentence can't stand, how can anything else? An argument has to hold up from beginning to end; theirs is lucky to complete a reasonable paragraph at any single point. I've wasted my time on this nonsense before, I don't have a whole lot of patience for it now.
Scots Taffer on 4/7/2007 at 00:52
I think that the attacks occurring at the same time as wargames or in the same place as terror scenarios drawn up by the government highlights one thing: 24 was more accurate than we will ever know, THERE ARE MOLES IN THE GOVERNMENT.
Convict on 4/7/2007 at 07:36
In regards to the allegation that the US government knew of the attacks before they happened, I am reminded of the alleged British government conspiracy to let Coventry be bombed rather than allow the secret of Ultra to be known.
Muzman on 4/7/2007 at 08:20
Except that one is admitted truth on record
N'Al on 4/7/2007 at 09:11
Quote Posted by Rug Burn Junky
I could come up with a 50,000 word argument on why the entire United States highway system is made of chocolate and sprinkles, but you wouldn't have to read the whole thing to tell me that it's bullshit, because it's PATENTLY OBVIOUS ON ITS FACE THAT IT'S A FUCKING FANTASY.
You, sir, have just destroyed my life. :(
Jeshibu on 9/7/2007 at 07:43
I don't believe in those conspiracy theories either, but that video can be summarized as FUCK YOU CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, FUCK YOU instead of really looking at their arguments and explaining
why they're bullshit. I'm all for insulting them, but that's not a rebuttal.
thefonz on 24/2/2008 at 15:10
(
http://zeitgeistmovie.com/)
What do you make of this?
Its certainly interesting; if a tad long (2hours).
Without doing my own research though, I dont know how true some of the stuff in it is.
