Sypha Nadon on 27/1/2006 at 21:22
I'd love to do half the cast of "Vampire:The Masquerade: Bloodlines". Sure, they aren't real people, buttttt...
Renzatic on 27/1/2006 at 21:25
Ha! What a fucking dork!
...is what I'd say if I didn't spank it to Bloodlines a few times myself.
Agent Monkeysee on 27/1/2006 at 21:32
Now hold on that's not fair. I didn't say she was an ogre, just that I, personally, don't find her that attractive. However as a celebrity she's bound to have at least a few photos where she looks drop-dead gorgeous.
That's like the inverse of posting that Carmen Electra mugshot and going lolollolers u find that hawt hahahaha FACE!
Quote Posted by Turtle
You need to do more doggy-style.
From on top next time.
Face don't mean much then.
I'll see what she thinks of that next time we have lunch.
Stitch on 27/1/2006 at 21:47
Quote Posted by Agent Monkeysee
Now hold on that's not fair. I didn't say she was an ogre, just that I, personally, don't find her that attractive. However as a celebrity she's bound to have at least a few photos where she looks drop-dead gorgeous.
Try the entirety of Buffy.
Truth be told, I don't think she's amazing. In the realms of Hollywood, she certainly wouldn't rank very high. My point simply is we get so used to judging these people from afar that we lose sight of the fact that we'd do just about any woman employed in Hollywood at least in part because of her looks. I think Jennifer Garner looks like a man and yet when I take a long, hard look inside I've got to admit I'd hit that shit like the fist of an angry god.
SubJeff on 27/1/2006 at 21:53
Quote Posted by Stitch
I think Jennifer Garner looks like a man and yet when I take a long, hard look inside I've got to admit I'd hit that shit like the fist of an angry god.
She
is a man isn't she. But in the great scheme of things you speak the truth re: relative attractiveness and our general desensitsation to these people because we see them on tv all the time.
TheAlbaniac on 28/1/2006 at 07:54
I guess with Buffy it was more of an acting performance issue than anything else. By the later seasons she was downright nasty/depressing, not to mention her acting got 'tiring', for lack of better words.
I don't think I'm the only one who enjoyed the acting of the rest of the cast more than Gellar's. It wasn't so much range or talent either, they were just more likable.
I can't help but wonder if any of that has to do with the personality of the actor. The degree to which I 'like' a character isn't always directly related to the evilness/goodness of him/her.
PigLick on 28/1/2006 at 07:55
Quote Posted by Stitch
The warm, comforting veil of internet does nothing to disguise your lies. If you were in a random bar and a chick identical to Buffy looked at you twice you'd kill everyone dear to you for one chance to hit that.
Hell, I think Natalie Portman isn't all that but sweet christ I'VE DONE WORSE.
I know this has already been quoted but fuck me its funny (and true)
in fact, "I've done worse" could be a good way to gauge what you should do in a situation.
Morte on 28/1/2006 at 17:53
Quote Posted by TheAlbaniac
I guess with Buffy it was more of an acting performance issue than anything else. By the later seasons she was downright nasty/depressing, not to mention her acting got 'tiring', for lack of better words.
I don't think I'm the only one who enjoyed the acting of the rest of the cast more than Gellar's. It wasn't so much range or talent either, they were just more likable.
Truth. I love Buffy the show, but Buffy the character really got on my nerves at times.
Also, Garner isn't a man, she's a fucking Predator. (I'd still hit it though, as long as the fear that she'd tear off her mask and EAT MY FACE didn't cause any...problems.)
TheAlbaniac on 28/1/2006 at 17:59
So, based on the comments so far, can I assume few people actually watch the show regularly?
Rug Burn Junky on 28/1/2006 at 18:11
Quote Posted by PigLick
in fact, "I've done worse" could be a good way to gauge what you should do in a situation.
uh oh
