SD on 28/3/2006 at 17:18
Quote Posted by jprobs
So, again... Terrorist did it! Not the US government.
I don't doubt Moussaoui was involved in terrorist activities, but his testimony is preposterous. "Osama Bin Laden told me to fly a plane into the White House" is just one rung above "God told me do it" on the credibility scale.
Rug Burn Junky on 28/3/2006 at 17:26
I was only joking, but I'm glad to see that it only took a little bit more than an hour for StD to seriously kick off the parade of "He's a patsy" comments.
jprobs on 28/3/2006 at 17:43
Quote Posted by Strontium Dog
I don't doubt Moussaoui was involved in terrorist activities, but his testimony is preposterous. "Osama Bin Laden told me to fly a plane into the White House" is just one rung above "God told me do it" on the credibility scale.
But yet you will consider internet folklore as "evidence" of a cover up.
Quote:
omg, why didnt i see this before!!1
I mean really, do you even know what the controversy is about? Did you read any of the thread at all?
From what I gather, huge ass passenger planes should leave a little more than a "dent" in the sides of buildings.
Yes I have read the thread. May I ask when the last time was that you flew a "huge ass passenger plane" into the side of a concrete structure?
My point is there may be a concealment of some evidence by the govenment for reasons they don't need to explain to you and I. But there is no conspiracy here. A friggin plane hit the pentagon, a plane hit tower 1, a plane hit tower 2, and a plane crashed in a field.
Again, 4 planes gone, 4 crash sites.
SD on 28/3/2006 at 17:48
Quote Posted by jprobs
But yet you will consider internet folklore as "evidence" of a cover up.
I have no idea what, specifically, you are referring to here.
Tocky on 29/3/2006 at 02:19
Quote Posted by Rug Burn Junky
Isn't it a bit
too much of a coincidence that the ineffectual shoe bomber and the one guy that they arrested were both supposed to be on the same plane?
It's funny you should say that but the first thing I thought was that Osama didn't want to risk upsetting the mentally challenged members with bombs so he put them on the same flight as a diversion.
Wyclef on 29/3/2006 at 02:23
Quote Posted by Gingerbread Man
seriously do they REALLY know that there isn't a gang of nutjobs trying to clone Jesus
When I acquire my billions, I will browse Snopes for some CRAZY ideas
BEAR on 29/3/2006 at 02:28
Quote Posted by jprobs
Yes I have read the thread. May I ask when the last time was that you flew a "huge ass passenger plane" into the side of a concrete structure?
I know, I should get out more often. God knows that you can only comprehend somthing by personal experience.
Quote Posted by jprobs
Again, 4 planes gone, 4 crash sites.
4 planes gone, 3 crash sites. By most accounts, the pentagon WASNT a typical crash site. I detest stupid conspiricy theories, but too much isnt right here. Why take all the video footage? I cant think of anything that would hurt, there was a ton of coverage afterwards, what would have it affected if they released the security camara footage?
I dont believe the government did it, but I think someone knows somthing they dont want the rest of us to know. They couldnt keep it a secret if it was a large scale conspiricy, someone would talk, post shit on the internets etc, but somthings fishy still. But the only thing I hate more than consipricy theorists are people who act like everything is always just like it appears.
Tocky on 29/3/2006 at 03:36
Ever consider that when top secret documents are lying about you might not want pictures of them floating about?
I keep imagining the dialog behind the coverup:
Agent 1- I've got it! We bomb our own building full of secret intelligence!
Agent 2- But we spend millions just keeping it secret.
Agent 1- Exactly! Noone will ever suspect we are that stupid!
Agent 2- Bygod you're right. It's foolproof!
BEAR on 29/3/2006 at 13:02
Hence why I say that didnt happen. I would say what happened (like usual) is far less interesting. I do think that there are alot of links to the middle east that they wouldnt like people to make, and things are definatly not like they seem, but I seriously doubt that bush or the government purportrated the attack itself.
I think all conspiricies are about like that, just too complicated to actually work when they cant keep shit secret, the only way it works is if not many people know about it, the problem is that they are surrounded by people all the time, aids, interns, secretarys, guards etc, somthing that big wouldnt stay a secret, but somthing aint right either. Everyone wants to believe there is more to things than what we can see, sometimes thats right sometimes not, but it does seem fishy.
Agent Monkeysee on 29/3/2006 at 17:10
This is the most secretive administration since Nixon and you're finding it odd that they're classifying all footage of DoD headquarters? Classifying everything is the default position for these people, and always has been. At least with the Pentagon footage there's a plausible argument for classification.
The Pentagon crash conspiracy theories are just as asinine as the WTC ones. The Pentagon isn't out in the middle of nowhere, it's smack in the middle of Arlington and DC. Hundreds if not thousands of people were outside at the time and SAW A COMMERCIAL JET AIRLINER CRASH INTO THE PENTAGON.
