jprobs on 16/3/2006 at 20:36
This is such a ridiculous argument
quinch on 16/3/2006 at 21:04
Quote Posted by Swiss Mercenary
That thing happens to be, you know, the
exterior of the fuselage. People tend to be on the interior of it.
Not to mention the fact that you are basing your entire argument off
one photograph.
But this photograph is evidence that supposedly proves that the pentagon was hit by an american airlines passenger jet, no?
I'm not sayng it didn't. I'm just trying to understand my gut reaction every time i see that picture. It looks like a mangled decoration on top of an immaculately iced wedding cake.
Swiss Mercenary on 16/3/2006 at 21:13
Quote Posted by quinch
But this photograph is evidence that supposedly proves that the pentagon was hit by an american airlines passenger jet, no?
Quote:
Contrary to the conspiracy theorists, the entire argument for the fact that the Pentagon WAS hit by a passenger jet IS based on a little bit more then that one photograph.
Nicker on 16/3/2006 at 21:43
Those opposed to this discussion thread are getting awfully shrill. If all you want to do is shout TARDS as loud as you can could you please take it outside?
I don't know what, if anything all the questions point to but there are serious questions going unanswered. The miracle cell-phone calls from flight 93 - the absence of aircraft wreckage at the pentagon and the supposed crash site of flight 93 - sequenced flashes of light accompanied with the ejection of debris from the towers, ahead of the collapsing rubble - the recording of an explosive seismic event immediately before the collapse (not the sound of falling debris) - the aircraft in the security video at the pentagon looks much smaller than a jumbo passenger plane - how did this plane penetrate so many rings of the pentagon while leaving windows adjacent to the impact site intact?
There are many things the official version does not answer and many answers contained in the evidence which government investigators spirited away. No one here is pinning the entire thing on one photo or one dubious discrepancy; there are a host of things that don't match up and haven't been explained and that the people currently holding the evidence don't want to even try to explain. The mere fact that the biggest crime scene in US history was sterilized before any forensic investigation was done is reason enough to raise a few eyebrows.
Swiss Mercenary on 16/3/2006 at 21:55
Quote:
I don't know what, if anything all the questions point to but there are serious questions going unanswered. The miracle cell-phone calls from flight 93 - the absence of aircraft wreckage at the pentagon and the supposed crash site of flight 93 - sequenced flashes of light accompanied with the ejection of debris from the towers, ahead of the collapsing rubble - the recording of an explosive seismic event immediately before the collapse (not the sound of falling debris) - the aircraft in the security video at the pentagon looks much smaller than a jumbo passenger plane - how did this plane penetrate so many rings of the pentagon while leaving windows adjacent to the impact site intact?
(
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html)
All of them answered there.
quinch on 16/3/2006 at 22:02
That website has a "win a ford escape hybrid" advert on it's homepage.
EDIT: LOL, i clicked close and was taken to secure.hearstmags.com/sweeps
Nice car. Roomy
Swiss Mercenary on 16/3/2006 at 22:06
Quote Posted by quinch
That website has a "win a ford escape hybrid" advert on it's homepage.
EDIT: LOL, i clicked close and was taken to secure.hearstmags.com/sweeps
Nice car. Roomy
No idea what you are talking about. Works fine for me.
SD on 16/3/2006 at 22:08
Quote Posted by Swiss Mercenary
All of them answered there.
Some are answered, or potentially answered, there. But by no means
all of them.
Pyrian on 16/3/2006 at 22:35
Quote Posted by Strontium Dog
But by no means
all of them.
Only because the bullshit has been piled so high. It's more than enough to demonstrate that the rather spectacular claims of grand conspiracy are based largely on uneducated conjecture rather than hard evidence.
