Swiss Mercenary on 16/3/2006 at 09:29
I can't speak for the guy, but he's got a pretty large bone to pick with the US, over the entire INFIDELS UPON OUR MOST HOLY GROUND in Saudi Arabia. I can't say I'd be at all able to consider ruling 9/11 from him out.
Not to mention that the meaning of the words 'terrorist cell' seems to elude the autor of that website.
Azal on 16/3/2006 at 09:37
I'm not going to wade into this crap again as, like with the creationism threads, I sick of metaphorically kicking the retards.
There's only much stupid you can see someone spout before you pass beyond the need to point out their errors and into the land of embarrased by proxy.
If anyone thinks the 9/11 conspiracy rantings hold a shred of truth, I suggest they go to the Popular Mechanics site that did an extensive rebuttal of a lot of the stupid crap that I've seen bandied about.
Carefull though, their site seems to enjoy crashing Firefox, so you'll have to use IE.
Quote Posted by Strontium Dog
Conspiracy theorists get a very bad name. I bet, if they never had the Zapruder film, people would still be ridiculing the JFK conspiracy theorists. Shit, people still
are.
Oh for fuck's sake, what is it this time?
Cancer Man hiding in the sewer? CIA lizardmen in invisible helicopters?
Epos Nix on 16/3/2006 at 09:50
And as with creationism threads, there seems to be this little sect of you who insist on berating those discussing rather than add to the discussion yourselves.
You called us all retards, thanks for your insight. :thumb:
quinch on 16/3/2006 at 10:11
i like the picture of that small aircraft part on the lovely lush lawn in front of the pentagon! Looks kind of cute. Where are the engines and the bodies?
I'm not sure why people keep going on about the fact that because a government is not able to organise pensions, tax and a reliable mail service then the most powerful military in the world is going to struggle to knock over a couple of buildings with remote controlled planes and a few explosives(if that is what happened). I reckon they have more chance of pulling it off than a few hijackers armed with box cutters, and i'm sure the mail service would run perfectly if there were billions of dollar in it for a few powerful people.
The trickiest military operations have usually involved the saving of life, hostages, civilians etc. Not applicable here.
Swiss Mercenary on 16/3/2006 at 10:16
Clearly, you've got to have bodies flying in every direction, when an aircraft traveling at 400 kmh rams into a building. I mean, its almost like momentum doesn't exist, and they can magically reverse the direction in which they are going.
Convict on 16/3/2006 at 11:28
Quote Posted by Aerothorn
Though they more go on about how apartheid is still around - if not economically, legally. They went to a white school this year - apparently, it's build like a fortress. Bleh.
That's probably because South Africa is the rape capital of the world. I had a friend back at uni whose dad was a surgeon there and they had a killing zone around their house. Other people I talk to from South Africa have similar stories. It's not about apartheid, it's about living in an extremely dangerous country.
Shayde on 16/3/2006 at 11:43
Aerothorn, there's no such thing as a white school.
Do you really think our government would allow segregation in schools? :rolleyes:
SD on 16/3/2006 at 12:16
Quote Posted by Tocky
records of the hijackers recieving flight training
It wasn't specifically mentioned in Loose Change, but can someone explain to me how Hani Hanjour, who could barely fly a 2-seater turboprop in August 2001, was able to pilot a Boeing 767 at 500mph into the Pentagon just a month later?
I'm willing to admit it was probably just bad luck on his part that he picked the only side of the Pentagon that had been reinforced to withstand such an attack, too.
SubJeff on 16/3/2006 at 12:49
Which edition did you see? I have the 2nd edition and it mentions all of that and the comments made by pilots and engineers are pretty interesting.
