[TTLG Book Club KICK] Submissions are now being accepted for March's book! - by Stitch
Aja on 14/11/2006 at 06:58
That description of Women in Love is mostly about the introduction and revisions to the Cambridge Edition. I'm rereading parts of the novel for an essay; Lawrence's writing really is beautiful at times:
Quote:
She had her desire of him, she touched, she received the maximum of unspeakable communication in touch, dark, subtle, positively silent, a magnificent gift and give again, a perfect acceptance and yielding, a mystery, the reality of that which can never be known, vital sensual reality that can never be transmuted into mind content, but remains outside, living body of darkness and silence and subtlety, the mystic body of reality. She had her desire fulfilled. He had his desire fulfilled. For she was to him what he was to her, the immemorial magnificence of mystic, palpable, real otherness.
The novel is not written entirely in this style, but the occasional striking paragraph is perhaps more effective than such dense language throughout.
Stitch on 14/11/2006 at 15:36
Quote Posted by Aja
That description of Women in Love is mostly about the introduction and revisions to the Cambridge Edition.
Yeah, I noticed that as well, but frankly that's all I could find and I was frantically trying to beat a snowstorm when I put the initial post together.
If you can find a better summary I'd be happy to swap it in.
Aja on 15/11/2006 at 00:40
Quote:
Women In Love, the book Lawrence considered his best, was written during World War I, and while that conflict is never mentioned in the novel, a sense of background danger, of lurking catastrophe, continually informs its drama of two couples dynamically engaged in a struggle with themselves, with each other, and with life's intractable limitations. Lawrence was a powerful, prophetic writer, but in addition he brought such delicacy to his treatment of the human and natural worlds that E. M. Forster's claim that he was the greatest imaginative novelist of our generation does him too little justice rather than too much.
i think it's probably too late by now, but whatever.
Stitch on 15/11/2006 at 18:12
Fix'd.
Kyloe on 15/11/2006 at 18:52
Quote Posted by Aja
i think it's probably too late by now, but whatever.
So sorry.
Shayde on 16/11/2006 at 12:40
I'm a bit surpised at the lack of support for D H Lawrence.
If The Damnation Game doesn't get selected then I'll suggest another Clive Barker book - The Great and Secret Show - for next month.
Stitch on 18/11/2006 at 20:22
rockin :cool:
Sorry about the omission, Paz, believe me it was unintentional. If you started your own book club where you picked each selection with ironclad absolute power I'd still be there.
Aja on 18/11/2006 at 20:25
Two in a row, eh Stitch? I guess putting your pick at the top of the list has really paid off! ;)
So this one discusses January 1, right? I might get in on it this time, my December's mostly free.
Paz on 18/11/2006 at 20:44
Nominating postmodern, magical-realism novels by flamboyant European/South American authors isn't really paying off for me, is it?
I still get to read them all for myself though, SO ULTIMATELY I WIN.
Plus, trying stuff that wouldn't normally appeal is what this thing is all about.
TheAlbaniac on 21/11/2006 at 17:11
Interesting to see that Chabon's book won, and now we're reading Motherless Brooklyn. See, on the (
http://www.librarything.com) LibraryThing site it shows that one of the top books owners of Motherless Brooklyn share, is Chabon's. Are they that much alike?
I haven't read either, but I just started Motherless Brooklyn, and I'm anxious to read this one.