oudeis on 4/7/2007 at 01:11
I was too old to be caught up in the 'toy-commercial-masquerading-as-animation' wave- transformers, he-man, etc- and even if I had been younger what they were doing with so insultingly blatant I still would have been contemptuous of the schlock they trowelled out. It was all part and parcel of Reagan's 'let's gut the regulatory agencies' version of laissez-faire capitalism, which we are seeing again under our current regime with the same old results.
All that said, the movie was way badass.
There were a few wincingly bad moments, like the dramatic handclasp between hero and heroine™ shot and Bay's usual overuse of the low-angle orbit shot, but it was on the whole very impressive. ILM really showed who's the big dog in the special effects neighborhood (the credits for the digital artists and animators were as big as all the others put together). I wish American directors would take lessons from their Hong Kong counterparts on how to edit a fight scene, though. Quick cuts may be necessary when you are trying to make Keanu look good, but when you have an effects budget big enough to launch a small war you let the fucking robots fight.
Stitch on 4/7/2007 at 06:11
Michael Bay may quite possibly be the worst director operating today.
Ko0K on 4/7/2007 at 06:57
I just came back from watching it. I personally thought that Bay did a fine job with this one.
Scots Taffer on 4/7/2007 at 07:25
Well, (
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/33228) this review heartily disagrees with you and also happens to be one of the funniest I've ever read. Doesn't sound like Bay has strayed too far from his usual stomping grounds of utterly derivative, soulless and artless direction of meaningless pap.
Muzman on 4/7/2007 at 07:53
Dude, you're like so missing the point! Giant Fucking Robots+Shit Blowing Up +Megan Fox is HAWT= delightful moviegoing experience.
(ok my fanboi impersonation needs work. I can actually tolerate Bay's 'humour' provided its balanced well with the action (which is to say it's a lot better than his 'drama', I'm looking at you Armageddon), but every report so far sounds like it takes ages to actually occur in this flick which is a little alarming)
Ko0K on 4/7/2007 at 08:23
Quote Posted by Scots_Taffer
Well, (
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/33228) this review heartily disagrees with you and also happens to be one of the funniest I've ever read. Doesn't sound like Bay has strayed too far from his usual stomping grounds of utterly derivative, soulless and artless direction of meaningless pap.
Perhaps, but that turned out to be a step in the right direction for this one. I've been looking at movies from marketing standpoint a lot lately, I admit. They set out to make a marketable product, and they did it. It does follow a tired formula and recycles/rehashes the same crap, but it was not a bad theater-going experience at all. My roommate is a Paramount employee, so I got to watch it with him for free. Maybe not having to spend money to watch it was a factor, too.
(edit) Let me just say that, if you walk into the theater expecting decent dialogue or sophisticated plot out of this movie, you are to blame for your own disappointment.
Phydeaux on 4/7/2007 at 08:28
Quote Posted by Stitch
Michael Bay may quite possibly be the worst director operating today.
You and I are in agreement.
"Armageddon" is an insult to anybody with 1/10th of a brain. OK, they've got to drill to this arbitrary 800 feet deep, but they miss the landing spot, so 800 feet is even more arbitrary, not to mention that it might not split in half like they expect, or that the rotation plot twist (to add drama because communication is disrupted) means that even if it's split perfectly in half, they probably wouldn't miss the Earth like they hoped, or that in the first place, even if they could crack it in half, it'd require WAY more force to move the halves apart than the nuke would produce. And what the fuck is "Space Dementia?" Although I do have to admit I liked Owen Wilson's line about Jethro Tull.
"Pearl Harbor" reigns supreme with the Worst Line Ever: "I think World War 2 just started".
I had been saying for years that MST3K favorite episode "Parts: The Clonus Horror" would make a pretty decent movie if it had a good cast and budget, so I was thrilled when I learned they in fact were making a new version, then subsequently crushed when I learned Bay was directing. I still haven't seen "The Island", which is a bit ironic considering how much I loved the shitty original version.
As for "Transformers", even if Bay didn't direct it, I'm not spending $10 for a 2+ hour GMC commercial.
SD on 4/7/2007 at 10:15
Quote Posted by Scots_Taffer
Doesn't sound like Bay has strayed too far from his usual stomping grounds of utterly derivative, soulless and artless direction of meaningless pap.
It's a movie based on toy robots. I suggest you look elsewhere for originality, soul and artistic meaning.
Scots Taffer on 4/7/2007 at 10:22
I wasn't implying that he should try to inject any of that into his films (good lord, can you imagine what horrors that would bring?) nor that the source material required it, I have no particular affection for the Transformers.
I was just iterating what I feel to be Bay's niche in the world of cinema - completely mindnumbing flashy crap. That said, I found his mindless The Island mildly entertaining the year it was released. I'm not above enjoying mindless pap as long as it's delivered well enough, but he can't even do that to be honest. That's all I was trying to say.
bob_doe_nz on 4/7/2007 at 10:35
Damn, did anyone watch it till the end of the credits
I want to know what happened...
or you could look up Michael Bays IMDB page...