ZylonBane on 19/1/2005 at 19:24
That, and image sigs in general are fecking retarded.
Gingerbread Man on 19/1/2005 at 20:31
Allow me to second that opinon in the most authoritative way possible.
New Horizon on 19/1/2005 at 21:03
Sorry about that gentlemen, no offense intended. I was just experimenting.
GlasWolf on 19/1/2005 at 22:38
I disagree - image sigs are great. Especially huge ones with garish colours that scream "LOOK AT ME!!!!111". Oh, if they're animated - even better. And huge, spinning, blinding avatars that prevent you from even reading the page until you've Adblocked them. And bloody marquee sigs... :mad:
Sorry. GlasWolf's pet peeve no. 344. I'll just go and lie down.
lokki on 20/1/2005 at 04:17
Quote Posted by Pheonix
Well, they could, at the least, say that they are working on "something."
While I'd love to agree, it's still the same old thing... they can't be held accountable for something they didn't say. By not mentioning the problems or a potential patch, they can keep away from sticking to any implied promise. The only way around that would be to say something like "Hey, we know you don't like it, but we don't plan to change it".
Of course, it would have to be diplomatic and market-savvy...
And I'm not sure if any developer has released tools with the intent of letting the audience make it's own patches. Perhaps if it were sold as a mod development kit :weird:
LordK2002 on 20/1/2005 at 10:12
Never mind the design flaws, let's see them fix the horrible gameplay-destroying bugs. The "ambient animation" bug(s) completely ruin the Clocktower for me.
Not that I'm holding my breath either.