rachel on 6/7/2024 at 15:41
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
You'll have to link me. Perhaps I missed something.
*sigh* It's a google search away, you can do your homework dude.
(
https://www.attitude.co.uk/news/keir-starmer-women-only-spaces-469056/)
Considering the literal years it takes to get a GRC in the UK to "prove" you're trans, this has nothing to do with protecting women from male predators and everything to with invalidating trans women, negating their experience and other them once again. Plus he's "willing" to meet The One Who Shall Not Be Named, seriously?? Get out of there...
This was a complete 180 from the Labour manifesto citing
"We will remove indignities for trans people who deserve recognition and acceptance".
I'll add this, because it's been a recurring thing with you, with all due respect: next time look it up yourself, SubjEff. Google is your friend. And don't mistake this for the start of a conversation about trans issues. I'm tired of justifying shit to people who are out of touch with our issues. If you really do care, do the work. Don't force us to dig up that shit for you, it's exhausting.
Subjective Effect on 6/7/2024 at 16:23
I still don't get what the issue really is, unfortunately.
Is it the agreement that biological women can have spaces for only biological women, agreeing to meet with JKR or maintaining the rule about a medical diagnosis before getting a GRC?
The issue for me is that I often don't know what is considered transphobic or not. I already have great difficulty understanding the concept that misgendering is violence. Doing it on purpose is being a dick and may be hate speech, but accidentally doing it being called violence by some is a stretch to me.
TheRealSlimGarrett on 7/7/2024 at 07:16
Quote Posted by Tomi
A bit like Tony Blair maybe?
That self-seving scumbag was more Tory than Maggie Thatcher!
