MorbusG on 23/4/2007 at 20:07
Awesome, thank you so much for these. :D
About the re-encoding of mp3's into flacs: Kolya, you are creating bits out of thin air. Not much sense in that.
Bjossi on 23/4/2007 at 20:11
I was wondering why he was doing that, I thought it was obvious enough that you can't magically add detail into a lossy file out of thin air.
Better rip the CD again with lossless quality to get all those valuable bits made by Eric. :cool:
ZylonBane on 23/4/2007 at 20:23
Sweet jesus, people, lay off the stupid pills. The reason Kolya re-encoded the MP3s as FLACs was to estimate how big FLACs of the source material would be.
JediKorenchkin on 23/4/2007 at 20:36
Only you guys would possibly bitch about the quality.
rachel on 23/4/2007 at 20:41
I can mirror at freylia too fwiw
Many thanks!!:D :D
Bjossi on 23/4/2007 at 20:45
Quote Posted by JediKorenchkin
Only you guys would possibly bitch about the quality.
Quality is important, bad quality = no joy in listening.
JediKorenchkin on 23/4/2007 at 20:47
Quote Posted by Bjossi
Quality is important, bad quality = no joy in listening.
Exxxxxxcept for the part where it's NOT bad quality.
Bjossi on 23/4/2007 at 20:58
Well, 320k is damn good, but lossless is even better, though I can't imagine there is much of an audible difference.
ZylonBane on 23/4/2007 at 21:11
This isn't about the listening quality (which is excellent), it's about the archive quality. Subtle but important distinction.
A FLAC rip would be ideal, but really, I'm thrilled with this as is.
Angelfire on 23/4/2007 at 22:31
Wtf I have no idea what you guys are talking about.
Too bad I have listened the SS2 songs so many times this really didn't do that for me :erg:
... although the first piece is excellent. Never heard that whisper so well.
