jkcerda on 21/4/2017 at 19:22
looks like someone has experience with said smuggling operation :D
Renzatic on 21/4/2017 at 19:23
I use people.
jkcerda on 21/4/2017 at 19:25
As long as I get the green card it's all good :D
Mr.Duck on 22/4/2017 at 16:44
I'll watch. Don't mind the smell of burnt butter.
Tony_Tarantula on 22/4/2017 at 18:22
Quote Posted by Renzatic
She announced earlier this week that this last run was her
last run.
...and this might be for the best. Hillary might be competent, intelligence, and experienced, especially compared to the fuckwit we currently have sitting in the big chair, but politically, she's damaged goods. To a lot of people, she's emblematic of all the backscratching, pork barreling, favor making, look the other way incestuousness in Washington DC. The only reason why we have a fuckwit in the big chair is partially due to the fact that too many people are just too suspicious of the Clintons, for reasons both unfair, and entirely warranted.
Bullshit. They'll find a nice comfortable, office for her somewhere.
And where is she "competent"? I mean FFS look at the results. This is more or less what she achieved:
Inline Image:
https://pics.onsizzle.com/syria-egypt-iraq-libya-aukstan-the-imperialist-reaper-2715125.pngShe's got a body count that would make George W. Bush proud.
jkcerda on 22/4/2017 at 18:46
Hence the reason neoconssupoorted her
Renzatic on 22/4/2017 at 19:04
Quote Posted by Tony_Tarantula
She's got a body count that would make George W. Bush proud.
You're making the same mistake JK is by assuming the previous situation in Libya and the current situation in Syria is due entirely to our interference. All simply so you'll have a better platform to base your argument on.
Now if you'll all excuse me, I'm off to watch more MST3k. SO SHUT THE FUCK UP, ALRITE? YOU'RE ALL HARSHIN MY LAFF! :mad:
jkcerda on 22/4/2017 at 19:21
Never said it was ENTIRELY due to our interference. We had no business interfering at all on their civil wars
MSTK3?
Renzatic on 22/4/2017 at 19:33
Quote Posted by jkcerda
Never said it was ENTIRELY due to our interference. We had no business interfering at all on their civil wars
I don't entirely disagree. Though tallying the current body count in Libya and Syria to contrast against Iraq, just so you can say "LOOK! OBAMA KILLED MORE PEOPLE THAN BUSH" is pretty flaky. He didn't start those wars. Didn't deploy troops to the cause. We launched a few missiles at some military targets, threw some guns at the opposition, and applied some sanctions here and there. He certainly didn't make things better, but those hundreds of thousands would've died regardless if we were there or not.
Hell, up until Trump bombed that airfield, which marks the first time the US has directly attacked the Syrian government, Russia were considerably more involved in their civil war than we were.
Mystery Science Theater 3000. If you don't know what this is, you're not cool.
bobRoss on 22/4/2017 at 21:31
Like Renzatic, I don't see the point in scorekeeping. I would however like to see a departure from this kind of nonsense going forward. It's a good way to create new problems in future decades when current politicians, aside from congresscritters (borrowed from CoffeeMaker), are no longer in office.
