Starker on 4/12/2019 at 19:01
Tony unquestioningly swallows propaganda again. This man that's numbered with two only bears a passing resemblance to al-Baghdadi who had a full beard when this photo was taken in 2013 and was extremely unlikely to be hanging around at the place where this photo is taken. One can only assume that the other "terrorists" in the picture are captioned with the same concern for the truth.
Tony_Tarantula on 6/12/2019 at 16:30
Quote Posted by Starker
Tony unquestioningly swallows propaganda again. This man that's numbered with two only bears a passing resemblance to al-Baghdadi who had a full beard when this photo was taken in 2013 and was extremely unlikely to be hanging around at the place where this photo is taken. One can only assume that the other "terrorists" in the picture are captioned with the same concern for the truth.
That guy's been reported dead several times already: (
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/abu-bakr-al-baghdadi-death-isis-islamic-state-leader-iraq-syria-a9173236.html)
Kind like how we killed Anwar Al several times.
So what's your take on the New York times story? Is that bullshit too?
Starker on 6/12/2019 at 18:56
Apart from you most likely misunderstanding something taken out of context, like you did that time when you claimed that a bunch of GOTV activists were proof of widespread voter fraud, yeah, it's a far right conspiracy theory. Nobody is getting "replaced", nor is there any concerted effort to "replace" anyone:
[video=youtube;VUbxVfSqtt8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUbxVfSqtt8[/video]
That doesn't explain why you're peddling years old debunked conspiracy theories, though.
Quote Posted by Tony_Tarantula
So what's your take on the New York times story? Is that bullshit too?
No, but it clearly doesn't say what you claim it does. The US supported rebels in Syria against the Assad regime, that's a well-known fact. A far cry from your leap to "We funded and armed ISIS!"
Renzatic on 6/12/2019 at 19:12
The only way the Great Replacement will take place is if someone starts poisoning our pumpkin spice supplies to kill white people.
...which COULD happen, people! They could also also put poison frogs in our Ugg boots!
Tony_Tarantula on 7/12/2019 at 01:52
On the "full beard" thing.
I too, had some fairly long facial hair at the beginning of 2017.
However my business headshot shows me with a clean face.....which means the person in my business headshot is obviously not me!
Look at a picture of the dude they killed more recently. It's the same damn dude.
Renzatic on 7/12/2019 at 02:26
I'd google it up, but I'm afraid I'd get put on a watch list.
Starker on 7/12/2019 at 04:21
Quote Posted by Tony_Tarantula
On the "full beard" thing.
I too, had some fairly long facial hair at the beginning of 2017.
However my business headshot shows me with a clean face.....which means the person in my business headshot is obviously not me!
Look at a picture of the dude they killed more recently. It's the same damn dude.
So he had a full beard, shaved it off and quickly regrew it to announce the caliphate? Give me a break.
Look at the beard he has in 2014: (
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-middle-east-28178272/isis-video-shows-al-baghdadi-alive-after-death-rumours)
You think it's "the same damn dude"?
Inline Image:
https://i.ibb.co/XFpnV3G/bagdaddy.pngInline Image:
https://i.ibb.co/8NJfz5t/bagdaddy2.pngDid he have a nosejob as well and grow bushier eyebrows while he was at it?
And why exactly would the leader of the freshly formed ISIS, whom US forces had been targeting and who had a $10 million reward on his head, meet with a senator of the US and give him a photo op? Why would a US senator pose with a well-known terrorist leader? You're so caught up in your conspiratorial thinking that you never once pause to think whether any of it actually makes any sense.
Renzatic on 7/12/2019 at 05:52
Quote Posted by Starker
Why would a US senator pose with a well-known terrorist leader?
Because it's McCain, who's now regarded as a traitor among The Faithful for speaking out against Trump.
Since his little spat with the president, I've seen a lot more pictures of him used as evidence of certain vaguely defined misdeeds in all those COINCIDENCE???!!!??? posts you see so often on the usual conspiracy sites.
...kinda like how no one ever mentioned George Soros until it was found out he donated to one of the groups who were bussing people in to the Ferguson protests, then suddenly he was EVERYWHERE!