Ko0K on 10/8/2007 at 00:27
By the way, I don't think minor complaints can come even close to keeping me from watching this movie again. As far as action movies go, I think the Bourne series as a whole is near-perfect, which unfortunately seems to highlight the flaws (as perceived by me, anyway). Yeah, it was most likely a stylistic decision, which is a matter of taste.
Dia on 10/8/2007 at 03:22
Well said, Ko0K.
Both times.
Tonamel on 12/8/2007 at 06:42
Quote Posted by DaveW
but when it cuts to another and it's still shaking around for no reason it kind of ruins it.
This.
It wasn't the shakiness during the fight scenes that bothered me. It was the shakiness
between the fight scenes that were the most distracting to me.
THEY'RE JUST HAVING LUNCH. STOP MOVING THE CAMERA.
That said, I still like the movie as a whole.
StealthThief on 13/8/2007 at 17:08
I thought that it was good. I liked Identity the best, then Supremacy, and this least of all. I agree that the camera jerking kinda ruined it. I still thought the movie was great though. Julia Stiles looked cute. :P
Stealth Thief
CCCToad on 16/8/2007 at 04:00
After seeing it...
ugh...
I admit, that the quality of the cinematics as very high, and the movie was outstanding from a technical standpoint.
But why the FUCK do they call this Bourne Ultimatum? like Supremacy, this movie that it would be a brilliant idea to dump the original plot. The screenwriters, obviously, know far better than Ludlum what type of character Bourne is and what twists his adventures should take. :rolleyes:
Instead, we get a hashed, been there, done that plot about a CIA coverup that just so happens to loosely tie into the media's current anger at wiretapping. One with plot twists so predictable, a phony psychic could see them coming.
If they had used a different name, I probably wouldn't have minded so much. As it was, I walked out of the film in disgust at how the original novel's were butchered for the sake of maintining Hollywood's film convention.
