gnartsch on 8/10/2012 at 20:33
(
http://www.gnartsch.de/Download/TDSTextExtractor_v0.3.zip) Version 0.3 is up !
A few recent examples of broken readables made clear, that my logic still had some flaws.
On one hand there was too much checking, on the other hand some important check were missing,
which even resulted in weird problem descriptions that made little sense.
Should be fixed now.
Oh, and as far as the resulting 'Review file' is concerned:
off course it makes little sense to hand it out to someone else as long there are major issues in the text.
These should be fixed first, but that should be common sense anyway.
gnartsch on 11/10/2012 at 16:12
(
http://www.gnartsch.de/Download/TDSTextExtractor_v0.4.zip) Version 0.4 is up.
I relaxed the rule that would complain about missing item-tags.
Turns out that this seems not always to be mandatory, but for sure it is for all files in the 'String_Tags' folder.
e.g. like in Misch.sch
Quote:
TextEntry
T_factionchangesCornerstone
lang_english 2004-03-17 08:51:06 ""
...
Also reworked the console-output to make it much easier to read.
And added a printout for the number of issues that were found.
snobel on 12/10/2012 at 11:18
Seems to be coming along nicely. :thumb:
Sometimes you get these (from checking Beleg's v0.99):
Quote:
checking CONTENT\T3\Books\English\String_Tags\Misc.sch
Line 208 :
lang_english 2004-03-12 10:43:49 "dummy - T_southquarterFirstEntryText"
### ATTENTION ### : Long words may break text.
T_southquarterFirstEntryText"
Quote:
checking CONTENT\T3\Books\English\String_Tags\MapRooms.sch
[...]
Line 487 :
lang_english 2004-02-29 21:48:00 "T_MapRoom_Storm_Cellar"
### ATTENTION ### : Long words may break text.
"T_MapRoom_Storm_Cellar"
It would probably be safe to ignore strings with "T_" or "dummy - T_" prefixes? Or report them as placeholders (if that's what they are) instead of long words, but they're probably benign, and can be ignored?
Another suggestion: Don't output "checking ..." text unless a verbose option is specified. Then you could include the placeholder warnings in verbose mode...
gnartsch on 12/10/2012 at 16:14
Yes, those T_...-things are quite annoying and could be ignored, since you would probably. It was on my todo-list already, but not at the very top.
Hmmmm... now that you remind me of it, I realize that this stuff shows up only in files in the String_Tags folder, and therefor they are not 'books' and the 'lenght-restrictions' would be much higher.
I guess I will simply skip that length-check for these kind of files.
And the 'checking...' will go away at some point as well - unless the file has problems (or verbose mode is requested).
Added to my todo-list.
Thanks for reporting ! :thumb:
