Oskar Cruo on 13/1/2010 at 10:14
No sequels anymore please, something new.
Old times are old times, time to go on.
Adam Nuhfer on 15/1/2010 at 14:47
Quote Posted by Nirok
...im tingling all over!!!...
January may have something to do with it.:eek:
terrannova on 15/1/2010 at 19:04
Quote Posted by Oskar Cruo
No sequels anymore please, something new.
Old times are old times, time to go on.
It has been 11 years since System Shock 2.
I want a sequel and I want a sequel to this game. The unexplained appearance of SHODAN in Tommy & Rebecca's escape pod needs to be addressed. I don't want BioShock 2, I don't want Deus Ex 3. I want
System Shock III.
System Shock feels like brand new everytime I play it and that's from 1994!
icemann on 16/1/2010 at 16:17
I want all 3
Oskar Cruo on 16/1/2010 at 21:37
Quote Posted by terrannova
It has been 11 years since System Shock 2.
I want a sequel and I want a sequel to this game. The unexplained appearance of SHODAN in Tommy & Rebecca's escape pod needs to be addressed. I don't want BioShock 2, I don't want Deus Ex 3. I want
System Shock III.
System Shock feels like brand new everytime I play it and that's from 1994!
There cannot be system shock 2. System shock 3 would feel so unnatural like fallout 3 or Deus Ex 2 were. We lived with dark engine that was the heart and soul of LG games. The SS3 experience would be artificial and forced. There doesn't have to be "explanation" for the ending, since the whole idea was to tease the player and leave much for imagination.
Ofcourse this makes you ask "then why was SS2 so good when SS1 was made with completely different engine"? Yes, I am biased. And yea, SS3 could propably work for kids and some old fans, but it would never be a smooth sequel to SS2. I think many hardcore SS1 fans think the same way about SS2.
Now if SS2 was good and SS1, then why with same logic couldn't SS3 be good? It could be, but it could aswell be with any other title than SS3 (like Bioshock was supposed to be "spiritual" follower of SS2 instead of being sequel).
But then, Im just old grumpy gamer who cannot adapt. I just long for the times of when gaming was somehow fresh and exciting.
Now it's just sequel after sequel, brand after brand, bigger budget after bigger budget. Gaming business glooms and so it brings the hollywoodish side effects of pop-culture. The vanish players and plain uncivilized deny this naturally since this generation is purely grown on bad taste and ignorance.
Enchantermon on 17/1/2010 at 01:12
I wholeheartedly disagree. SS3 could be made and made well. Will it ever be? Unlikely. But it certainly could happen if the right people with the right motives and heart did it, regardless of the engine.
Oskar Cruo on 17/1/2010 at 11:06
Quote Posted by Enchantermon
I wholeheartedly disagree. SS3 could be made and made well. Will it ever be? Unlikely. But it certainly could happen if the right people with the right motives and heart did it, regardless of the engine.
That is for sure, but like you said; unlikely.
van HellSing on 17/1/2010 at 11:47
A proper System Shock 3 is impossible after the commercial success of BioSuck.
