Eldron on 15/9/2007 at 08:47
post a clean image of the model in max, with the wireframe on, and with the wireframe off, that would help alot, and do mention the trianglecount :)
RocketMan on 15/9/2007 at 15:20
did you have a plan in mind or something?
Eldron on 15/9/2007 at 16:16
lots of feedback and a push in the right direction.
William Dojinn on 15/9/2007 at 19:56
I'm a bit curious on the thing having a built in level. If there was a way to rotate the head so it won't interfear with measuring level-ness i could see that, but as is I just don't get how that would work. Maybe a guadge to show how much torque is being applied?
Lansing on 15/9/2007 at 21:27
A torque gauge would be a very sensible thing for a wrench to have so that would be my guess as to what it is too.
RocketMan on 15/9/2007 at 22:40
Quote Posted by Lansing
A torque gauge would be a very sensible thing for a wrench to have so that would be my guess as to what it is too.
I was thinking that myself although it is certainly believable...its not that hard to make the wrench level on its side.
William Dojinn on 15/9/2007 at 23:12
Question is, what's the point in having a built in level? At least with a torque guage you have immidiate feedback on the tool's primary function.
Then again this IS trioptimum, they'ren ot exactly known for being practical.
demagogue on 16/9/2007 at 18:10
I thought the level was a little funny because that big head and handle don't make it particularly easy to actually lay the wrench down level. How useful could it be? Also, of course, because no matter what angle you put it at, the bubble will always be in the center. It's just a nice, quirky touch.
William Dojinn on 16/9/2007 at 18:14
Oh just to share on my thoughts about that thing you circled on the handle. That looks like a larger groove that has a blood splatter on it(in case you were wondering what the red slotch right there was).
