Para?noid on 29/4/2006 at 16:05
IMAGE MACROS DON'T NEED TEXT. It's so redundant. Has anyone seen that episode of The Day Today about exploding bomb dogs, where the narrator describes the scene that the audience can see for themselves? It's like that. Utterly redundant.
Please, I emplore you, I fucking beg you someone just agree with me on this
Convict on 29/4/2006 at 16:07
But I am culturally illiterate. :( An image macro may make sense for an American but not make sense for other people too. But I am too internet illiterate to include image macros (you mean gifs right?) anyway so..
Malygris on 29/4/2006 at 16:12
What's an image macro?
Briareos H on 29/4/2006 at 16:12
INTERNET DOESN'T NEED IMAGE MACROS.
Wyclef on 29/4/2006 at 22:41
<img src="http://www.ritilan.com/archives/images/blogimages/070904_aliens_in_30_sec_with_bunnies.PNG">
Shadowcat on 30/4/2006 at 02:09
Quote Posted by Malygris
What's an image macro?
I want to know too. The phrase makes absolutely no sense to me in the context of this thread/complaint.
Malygris on 30/4/2006 at 06:59
On behalf of dial-up users around the world, I would like to issue the following public service announcement:
FUCK OFF WITH THE FUCKING PICTURES ALLA FUCKING TIME
Or, as you seem to prefer, the image macros, which seems like a pretty fucking round-about way of saying it, but hey, gotta impress the chicks somehow am i rite
Scots Taffer on 30/4/2006 at 08:04
more like dial up, fuck off our internet and get into the 2000s :cool:
