Should Terminally Online people be considered a "Mental illness"? - by SolidSnakeRoll
SolidSnakeRoll on 7/10/2023 at 16:53
I am not saying you cant go wild during weekends or holidays. After all that hard work you have deserved it.
But who wants their head turned to mush from all the dumb stupid "Podcasts and conspiracy people" everyday in their life?. Isnt there a point where you go.
Oh wow i am turning into a mess?. Maybe i should
1: Dont be terminally online
2: Go to school
As a reddit post said "Life is easier if you arent stupid".
So basically. At 9PM to 4AM in weekdays, thats the focus. And then you can prioritize stupid stuff in weekends or holidays.
I just wonder why people love to engage in stupid people as a sport?
Pyrian on 8/10/2023 at 16:19
Are you asking for a friend, or?
mxleader on 8/10/2023 at 18:08
Shouldn't your question be asked offline?
Sulphur on 9/10/2023 at 03:12
Cool, zero net signal to noise ratio. Let's just permaban him (again), I think.
Jason Moyer on 12/10/2023 at 03:18
I've been terminally online since 1994 or 95 and I don't spend all day listening to podcasts or pay attention to conspiracy nonsense, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.
mxleader on 12/10/2023 at 03:23
I'm online now.
qolelis on 12/10/2023 at 07:25
Nah, I'm not on the line, I'm crossing it, doing it, drawing it. LINES. Very terminal.
Nicker on 14/10/2023 at 22:56
Isn't it line segments that are terminal?
Asking for a low-numeractic friend on another thread.
Quote Posted by mxleader
I'm online now.
Something something flatline something...
R Soul on 21/10/2023 at 18:22
First post:
1. Bossing people around
2. Suspected projection
Shame really as it could be interesting to discuss how some websites grab peoples' attention, and how some are more susceptible than others to the effect of that, and what, if anything, people can do to mitigate these challenges so that as many people as possible can get on with their lives, with websites serving them rather than the other way round.
