Short listening test - TTLG Forums

Valet2 on 20/5/2007 at 21:32

I keep original tracks in flac. But my new iPod supports mp3 and wav. So I need to uncompress flac every time I manage my playlist.

Kolya on 21/5/2007 at 03:10

If it's an ipod it probably can run (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockbox) rockbox which supports flac among a whole slew of other formats (ogg, etc.).

Valet2 on 21/5/2007 at 05:40

Thanks a lot!

(http://img392.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img5712tu2.jpg)

Inline Image:

http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/9746/img5712tu2.th.jpg

Rogue Keeper on 21/5/2007 at 07:17

Quote Posted by Kolya

If it's an ipod it probably can run (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockbox) rockbox which supports flac among a whole slew of other formats (ogg, etc.).

No support for Philips HDD6320...:( Oh, actually I don't care.

Kolya on 21/5/2007 at 12:11

Just read (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockbox#Unsupported) this on the rockbox wiki page and had a little laugh :D

Quote:

Unsupported
* Digital rights management

steo on 23/5/2007 at 09:41

So are we ever going to find out which is the higher quality?

Kolya on 23/5/2007 at 09:47

Yeah, the poll closes tomorrow. It's written at the top by the way. :)

Martin Karne on 23/5/2007 at 18:30

Philips?
I felt the horror running down the spine every time I had to service a Philips product.
Don't get me started on them.

Rogue Keeper on 24/5/2007 at 07:41

Suit yourself, I'm not a Philips fanboy either. I bought it because $200 seemed to be a good bargain for a new 30GB jukebox. Yes, definitely it has it's disadvantages (like any other brand) and I don't recommend it to anyone, but it's like a picky girlfriend with high standards, once you know to treat her properly, she serves you well most of the time. But certainly my next one won't be Philips (and neither iPod).

Schattentänzer on 24/5/2007 at 21:13

Poll is closed, but I'd say #2 is 128kbps