David on 1/10/2005 at 16:26
In actual fact they're the other way round - [spoil] is newer than [spoiler]
Fingernail, what doesn't work? And did you press CTRL + F5 as the announcement asked you to if you were having issues with posting?
Fingernail on 1/10/2005 at 16:34
meh, works now.
David on 1/10/2005 at 18:08
Debug mode
MsLedd on 1/10/2005 at 18:59
Quote Posted by Enchantermon
Agreed.
Also agreed. And, I don't know about anyone else, but I liked the old spoilers that didn't separate the marked text from the rest of the post. Example: I like
this old version as opposed to [SPOILER]the newer and default version.[/SPOILER]
Enchantermon
Both versions of the spoiler tag have been there since the beginning (back in the day, when I had to actually create a Perl code to add to the old forums), though only the 'SPOILER' version was a quickie-button.
dvrabel on 1/10/2005 at 19:03
Oooo. I like the new "edit post" interface, very nifty. Thanks David, for putting the time in to update the software :)
Enchantermon on 1/10/2005 at 19:47
Quote Posted by David
In actual fact they're the other way round -
is newer than [spoiler]Quote Posted by MsLedd
Both versions of the spoiler tag have been there since the beginning (back in the day, when I had to actually create a Perl code to add to the old forums), though only the 'SPOILER' version was a quickie-button.
Okay, my bad. But the fact remains about which I think works better. ;)
And.....a spellchecker for the n00bs! Now, I wonder how many will actually use it.....
Enchantermon
Eshaktaar on 1/10/2005 at 23:28
You can highlight the text you want to represent the link with (if you use the Insert Link button). The URL tag gets wrapped around it automatically, then.
Gray on 1/10/2005 at 23:52
Quote Posted by Gingerbread Man
Like fingerprint-scan log on
Oh! Oh! Can we have DNA logon verification? Can we? Can we? Huh?
