Goldmoon Dawn on 19/10/2017 at 18:04
Quote Posted by Starker
cough*she's on the verge of dying*cough.
Im still holding out hope on this one. That chick gets wobbly! :D
lock her up!
henke vid hilarious, so true, ventura been dodging and hinting for *years* lmao
Tony_Tarantula on 23/10/2017 at 12:20
Quote Posted by Starker
The way I see it, in the end, it matters very little whether Lord Dampnut does things out of malice or stupidity or both. Conspiring with a foreign power to influence US elections is collusion in my mind, no matter whether it's an established relationship or simple opportunism.
As for Hillary, I couldn't care less. She's not the president of the US. Also, her scandals tend to be largely manufactured or vastly overblown or outright conspiracy theories. Cough*benghazi*cough*pizzagate*cough*she's on the verge of dying*cough.
A: Despite all the hubbub, there's still zero tangible evidence to support that Trump was "Conspiring with a foreign power to influence US elections".
B: How can we ignore Hillary when she keeps butting back into things herself blaming everyone from working class women to "Macedonian content farms"(sic)?
Besides which...sure a lot of the ideas people come up with her are crazy, but the truth is even worse in some of those instances. Benghazi is a prime example because (
https://www.salon.com/2015/05/28/the_benghazi_outrage_we_actually_should_be_talking_about/) the real outrage is that State Department and CIA were collaborating to ship weapons to terrorists. That's MUCH worse than "Hillary's incompetence let them die and then she covered it up". One's just a bog standard coverup, the other means State Department under her direction was directly responsible for ISIS becoming as powerful as they did and everything that went along with it to include the migration crisis.
Starker on 23/10/2017 at 12:34
Zero evidence? What do you call the e-mail where they outright admit collusion, then? If a foreign government offers you information on your political opponent, you should report it to the FBI, like Al Gore's campaign did when they got information on Bush.
Also, why would you pay any attention to what Hillary says? She lost. Doesn't matter who she blames, she is not the president. She is not making policy in the White House. Though you would hardly know it from the way she is being constantly brought up by Lord Dampnut's fans.
Also also, Hillary is not some kind of superperson who has the sole power to shape US policy, no matter how much the right wing pundits keep hyping her up and attributing her superhuman abilities. Take the uranium deal, for example... she was one of nine people on the board that gave the okay to sell the majority of the company (not the uranium, btw -- exporting rights were not a part of the deal), and she was not even directly involved, but you'd think she single-handedly sold uranium to Russia from the way it has been reported.
