Scots Taffer on 7/10/2011 at 02:49
dethtoll's user rating would probably offset his post count somewhat :p
Ghostly Apparition on 7/10/2011 at 06:44
Quote Posted by dethtoll
Thank you for proving my point exactly.
The point being you are against the idea simply because you know it would cast you in a bad light, that
isn't exactly an objective reason to be against it. However I do agree with you that it would be a bad idea, but for the reasons Dia posted.
june gloom on 7/10/2011 at 07:27
Who the hell taught you to read?
What I said was that a system like that would be ripe for abuse, and as your previous comment shows, you would be exactly the kind of person abusing it. Among many others, like those wonderfully internetty people who have some sort of years-long grudge against me because I was mean to them once, or the usual trolls like CCCToad who's just a passive-aggressive motherfucker all day long when he's not deepthroating bananas and hating queers.
Also I should mention that Dia's first post in this thread was agreeing with me. Abort/retry/FAIL
Gingerbread Man on 7/10/2011 at 13:53
Oh, we have a reputation system alright. It is based entirely on the flimsy and dim recollections of posts past and it filters its way up through years of opium and nasally-injected chemicals that only have numbers for names. David, Ulukai, and myself all float in tanks of bacta, as we have since the Great Schism during the time of Zantie, and we remember dimly each of the millions of words inscribed herein.
Once a year our tanks are hooked together and we share information. Dimly recalled, drug-addled information. We have built a simulation and we are prepared to use it.
On all of you.
Forever420 on 7/10/2011 at 14:30
LOL, we should be having ability to liek posts, dat way we can share love around.
Ghostly Apparition on 7/10/2011 at 15:19
Quote Posted by dethtoll
Who the hell taught you to read?
What I
said was that a system like that would be ripe for abuse, and as your previous comment shows, you would be exactly the kind of person abusing it. Among many others, like those wonderfully internetty people who have some sort of years-long grudge against me because I was mean to them once, or the usual trolls like CCCToad who's just a passive-aggressive motherfucker all day long when he's not deepthroating bananas and hating queers.
Also I should mention that Dia's first post in this thread was agreeing with me. Abort/
retry/FAIL
Thank you for proving my point exactly.
Dia on 7/10/2011 at 16:54
Quote Posted by Gingerbread Man
We have built a simulation and we are prepared to use it.
On all of you.
OHGOD OHGOD!!!! NOT THE .....(insert sinister music here)....
SIMULATION ....!!!!!
Take Forever420; PLEASE!!! We'll
gladly sacrifice him to your collective omnipotencisity. Anything to appease!
JUST PLEASE PLEASE NOT THE (insert more sinister music here) ....
SIMULATION ...!!!
I'm outta here.
june gloom on 7/10/2011 at 18:08
Quote Posted by Ghostly Apparition
Thank you for proving my point exactly.
That's cute. But you don't have a point. Try actually responding to what I said instead of giving me bullshit.
PotatoGuy on 7/10/2011 at 19:26
It's amazing how badly ttlg always wants to have the last word.
even this post
Harvester on 7/10/2011 at 19:33
Quote Posted by Gingerbread Man
Oh, we have a reputation system alright. It is based entirely on the flimsy and dim recollections of posts past and it filters its way up through years of opium and nasally-injected chemicals that only have numbers for names. David, Ulukai, and myself all float in tanks of bacta, as we have since the Great Schism during the time of Zantie, and we remember dimly each of the millions of words inscribed herein.
Once a year our tanks are hooked together and we share information. Dimly recalled, drug-addled information. We have built a simulation and we are prepared to use it.
On all of you.
WE'RE JUST PAWNS IN YOUR LITTLE GAME, AREN'T WE???? :mad::mad::mad:
