june gloom on 18/1/2010 at 20:47
No, it means you're expected to have a little common fucking sense. Which you clearly don't, because even someone who joined yesterday would have gathered that Ren was being sarcastic.
Swiss Mercenary on 18/1/2010 at 21:12
Is there any particular reason for why dethtoll needs to drag out the beating of CCCT?
Honestly, do we really need 10 posts of HURR LUL U R RETARD, when one can suffice?
When RBJ does that to someone, he does it with flair and wit. You... Lack his eloquence, dethtoll.
CCCToad on 18/1/2010 at 22:10
He's obviously bored. That and I seem to have personally offended him somehow, he wanted me banned permanently just for disagreeing with him.
How about entertaining yourself with a (
http://www.addictinggames.com/theidiottest.html) flash game?
june gloom on 19/1/2010 at 00:28
Can you guys take your bromance elsewhere? I'm just calling CCCHoad out on his obliviousness. Not my fault he can't man up. I'm not RBJ, I'm not trying to be RBJ. I just call it as I see it.
Stitch on 19/1/2010 at 00:37
Quote Posted by CCCToad
He's obviously bored. That and I seem to have personally offended him somehow, he wanted me banned permanently just for disagreeing with him.
You are quite possibly the most thin-skinned poster on this forum.
gunsmoke on 19/1/2010 at 01:39
Quote Posted by CCCToad
Or so says (
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/6966628/Facebooks-Mark-Zuckerberg-says-privacy-is-no-longer-a-social-norm.html) Facebook's Founder.
OK, so the title is a bit of hyperbole. That said, I find his basic assertion questionable at best. For many people, its not that they have no expectation of privacy, but that they don't bother to think about what they're posting. Others, like myself, don't post stuff on facebook because I don't want privacy. If I post it on facebook, its a thought, link, or photo that I WANT my friends to see. If I want something to be private (for example, the details of a spat with the girlfriend) I don't post it.
He is making an illogical connection: Simply because people aren't taking advantage of their right to privacy doesn't mean that the idea should be discarded. I see it as as being similar to the right to silence you have when you are arrested: Just because you don't use it doesn't mean it shouldn't exist.
Basically, my thoughts in a nutshell. I don't stand by the rest of your statements in the thread, but this one sums my opinions up nicely.
june gloom on 19/1/2010 at 01:48
Quote Posted by Stitch
You are quite possibly the most thin-skinned poster on this forum.
I dunno, scarykitties might be the king of that. Except he doesn't post as much.
Stitch on 19/1/2010 at 02:50
You are quite possibly the most grudge-holding-est poster on this forum.
Muzman on 19/1/2010 at 02:59
I say we find out where they live and hire indigent ex-IT workers to kick their asses.
Shouldn't be too hard these days.
37637598 on 19/1/2010 at 04:42
Some people just don't grow out of their "fit throwing" habits. This whole thread sucks, it just completely sucks. It started out with people arguing about what real privacy is, which can simply be resolved with a quick and painless dictionary search, then led on to this back and forth display of immature whining, which reminds me, I have to get back to my amazing life of being content and humble. You know, I love humanity, but I hate humans.
