Primarily Retarded (or 'Retarted' for all you voters out there)

CCCToad on 4/8/2010 at 01:50

The thing that really pisses me off, though, is that it seems like a lot of the worst Bush policies have been continued by (and in many cases even (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.html) outdone by Obama). Bush's influence in Washington just won't die.

Scots Taffer on 4/8/2010 at 01:53

Ahahahaha priceless Kolya

Rug Burn Junky on 4/8/2010 at 02:03

Yes, because Kolya's very own brand of impotent snark is both welcome, and not at all motivated by his own petty jealousies.

Winedrinker on 4/8/2010 at 02:13

Hey junko.

If you don't want to discuss your feelings on the matter with him, would you mind telling me?

CCCToad on 4/8/2010 at 02:18

Quote:

I have no problem with ideological disagreement. The only thing I find so repulsive about most of your posts is that they are plainly ignorant of facts and you draw ridiculous, erroneous conclusions

Which is a crock and you know it: You're perfectly happy with ignorance as long as that ignorance results in an opinion you deem acceptable.

Turtle on 4/8/2010 at 02:31

Quote Posted by Queue

So, I, as are many registered Democrats, am voting for a certain Republican candidate in the primary who is a highly intelligent, outspoken, and decidedly moderate (i.e. not a religious lunatic) in the field instead of voting between the two democratic candidates.

(http://img29.imageshack.us/i/bs1369083559albumsrando.jpg/)

Inline Image:

http://a.imageshack.us/img29/2982/bs1369083559albumsrando.jpg

NERDS!

Rug Burn Junky on 4/8/2010 at 02:33

Quote Posted by Winedrinker

Hey junko.

If you don't want to discuss your feelings on the matter with him, would you mind telling me?

You've got this shit backwards. First, you explain to us why you're worthy of engaging in discussion, by contributing either well thought ideas or questions. Then you may have the right to importune on my time and thinking.

Strike one against: don't ever fucking call me "junko" again.

Quote Posted by CCCToad

Which is a crock and you know it: You're perfectly happy with ignorance as long as that ignorance results in an opinion you deem acceptable.

Delude yourself into thinking this if you so desire, it will protect your fragile worldview from intrusion by reality after all.

But you are sadly mistaken. My record speaks for itself, and you will not find evidence of me endorsing the views of anyone in whose logic I find fault just because I find their ultimate conclusion agreeable. Though given a shared understanding, they are not usually so blockheaded in refusing to see the error of their logic, and thus, not entrenched into ignorance the way you so often are.

But that's not even relevant, again belying your difficulty with basic logic. Instead you should concern yourself with the converse. Since I take it as rather a given that I will find your ultimate opinion disagreeable (based on our repeated interactions I have general faith in this heuristic) the more relevant case - and the best you could hope for - is that I would find your opinion acceptable in spite of my disagreement because you were able to base it on sound logic and reasoning. You have repeatedly failed to do so, and that is why you are judged lacking. That you are even blind to the fact that this is the goal to which you should aspire (in all endeavours, not merely with respect to myself) is telling.

AR Master on 4/8/2010 at 03:14

Quote Posted by Rug Burn Junky

Strike one against: don't ever fucking call me "junko" again.

daw shit son, you've gone and unleashed the fucking fury

WILL TTLG EVER BE THE SAME AGAIN?????????????????

Thief13x on 4/8/2010 at 04:00

Jerry Jerry Jerry

Sulphur on 4/8/2010 at 07:04

Dammit RBJ, you're being baited. By someone who registered today and is named winedrinker, no less.