ZylonBane on 29/11/2006 at 17:03
It's weird that she seemed to play a much younger character in Dusk Till Dawn, even though that was released the year after Strange Days.
Dinksmallwood on 29/11/2006 at 18:03
Has anybody ever thought that 'Sean Penn' (ok, younger Sean Penn) could be No. 1?
Everytime I look on this picture I think this could be Sean Penn. The eyebrows, the mouth, the long nose...
I must admit though that I just have googled a little bit and couldn't find a picture of Sean Penn that fits to this one... so perhaps I'm just completely wrong... :eww:
RocketMan on 29/11/2006 at 22:03
But the stim pic looks a lot more like the first pic you posted than the second...she isn't even looking at the camera in that one.
JossiRossi on 29/11/2006 at 22:26
The first pic is the source of the original stimpic.
The second pic is a capture from the movie directly.
Hollowtip on 13/12/2006 at 10:51
I don't know whats wrong with the Machiavelli claim for number 1.
Inline Image:
http://www.kotaku.com/assets/resources/2006/09/machiavelli.gifIt does look a
little different, but thats due to the heavy pixelation and the fact that the images weren't scaled to exactly fit over each other. Otherwise its a perfect match (look at the lighting on the neck and cheek, and the background with the white patch). If there's anything you should go by, it should be the lighting, because that is one of the hardest things to match, and changing it usually ends up with the image looking flat, so it is the least likely to be altered.
JossiRossi on 13/12/2006 at 18:33
I didn't agree before but that really looks like it could be it.
RocketMan on 13/12/2006 at 19:38
I know this overlay transition thing is really cool and all, but i think its a bit deceptive. When you have two images on top of eachother and they are blending back and forth, I think it tricks many people into seeing similarities that arent there. It definately has its benefits when comparing feature shape and location and stuff like that but you really need to take a look at the pictures on their own to see how close they are.
ZylonBane on 13/12/2006 at 21:12
They're useful for making C0rtexReaver look like a fool though.
Nameless Voice on 13/12/2006 at 21:18
I don't think much of that two-frame animation, since it doesn't show the original picture on its own at all, which makes comparison difficult.
C0rtexReaver on 13/12/2006 at 21:36
Quote Posted by ZylonBane
They're useful for making C0rtexReaver look like a fool though.
Say what you will, but I'm still not convinced. You've yet to adequately explain the difference in the shape of that chick's mouth. (And, no. . . "pixilation" ain't gonna cut it.
-CR
