jkcerda on 30/9/2018 at 19:25
Quote Posted by Renzatic
Given the circumstances? Professionally.
Bullshit. There are threats against your family and you KNOW she's fucking lying
Renzatic on 30/9/2018 at 19:30
Quote Posted by jkcerda
Bullshit. There are threats against your family and you KNOW she's fucking lying
Ford and her family are also being threatened. She still handled herself better.
jkcerda on 30/9/2018 at 19:36
Cause she's a lying pos with nothing to lose and is making bank. .... do love the conspiracy crap floating around on BOTH of them. Reynolds must be making a killing here
nbohr1more on 30/9/2018 at 19:38
Oh baloney. This is "not an answer"
Quote:
DURBIN: Personally, do you think that’s the best thing for us to do? You won’t answer?
KAVANAUGH: … Look, senator, I — I’ve — I’ve — I’ve said I wanted a hearing and I’d said I was welcome (ph) anything. I’m innocent. This thing was held — held when it could have been presented in the ordinary way. It could have been held and handled confidentially at first, which was what Dr. Ford’s wishes were as I understand it. It wouldn’t have caused this — like, destroyed my family like this — this effort has.
He is basically saying "go ahead and send an FBI sniff dog up my asshole". I offered this right at the outset but you are pretending I don't want an investigation.
Renzatic on 30/9/2018 at 19:39
Once again, let's break this down to what's happening, with all the drama cast aside.
A man is in the running for the Supreme Court.
A woman comes forward to claim he's not fit for the position, that he sexually assaulted her.
Much hooplah is made. Both come forward and offer their statements in front of a senate committee.
The woman's testimony is credible enough to warrant further investigation, which is now happening.
What exactly is beyond the pale here?
Renzatic on 30/9/2018 at 19:46
Quote Posted by nbohr1more
He is basically saying "go ahead and send an FBI sniff dog up my asshole". I offered this right at the outset but you are pretending I don't want an investigation.
DURBIN: This morning — this morning, I asked Dr. Ford, I asked her about this incident where she ran into Mark Judge in Safeway, and she said, “Sure, I remember it.” Six or eight weeks after this occurrence.
Well, someone at The Washington Post went in and took a look at Mr. Judge's book and has been able to — the one that he wrote about his addiction and his alcoholism — and they have narrowed it down, what they think was a period of time six or eight weeks after the event. And he would have been working at the Safeway at that point.
So the point I'm getting to is we at least can connect some dots here and get some information. Why would you resist that kind...
KAVANAUGH: Here's some (ph) dots.
DURBIN: ... of investigation? Why would you resist that kind of investigation?
KAVANAUGH: Senator, I — I welcome — I wanted the hearing last week.
DURBIN: I'm asking about the FBI investigation.
KAVANAUGH: They're — the committee figures out how to ask the questions, I'll do whatever. I've been on the phone multiple times with committee counsel. I'll talk to...
DURBIN: Judge Kavanaugh, will you support an FBI investigation...
KAVANAUGH: ... I'll do — I'll...
DURBIN: ... right now?
KAVANAUGH: ... I — I will do whatever the committee wants to...
DURBIN: Personally, do you think that's the best thing for us to do? You won't answer?
KAVANAUGH: ... Look, senator, I — I've — I've — I've said I wanted a hearing and I'd said I was welcome (ph) anything. I'm innocent. This thing was held — held when it could have been presented in the ordinary way. It could have been held and handled confidentially at first, which was what Dr. Ford's wishes were as I understand it. It wouldn't have caused this — like, destroyed my family like this — this effort has.
DURBIN: I think an FBI investigation will help all of us on both sides of the issue.
Starker on 30/9/2018 at 19:48
Quote Posted by Renzatic
Once again, let's break this down to what's happening, with all the drama cast aside.
A man is in the running for the Supreme Court.
A woman comes forward to claim he's not fit for the position, that he sexually assaulted her.
Much hooplah is made. Both come forward and offer their statements in front of a senate committee.
The woman's testimony is credible enough to warrant further investigation, which is now happening.
What exactly is beyond the pale here?
That's still not quite what happened, Renz. First the man was put on a list of potential candidates compiled by a political think tank. That's when the woman came forward.
Gray on 30/9/2018 at 19:48
Quote Posted by Renzatic
Once again, let's break this down to what's happening, with all the drama cast aside.
A man is in the running for the Supreme Court.
A woman comes forward to claim he's not fit for the position, that he sexually assaulted her.
Much hooplah is made. Both come forward and offer their statements in front of a senate committee.
The woman's testimony is credible enough to warrant further investigation, which is now happening.
What exactly is beyond the pale here?
Exactly. Let's stick with that.
Vae on 30/9/2018 at 19:52
Quote Posted by Renzatic
Per the breakdowns, he evaded over half the questions asked him. This is more than "some".
"Some" pertains to an unspecified percentage of a whole, so there's nothing more than "some", other than the whole.
Regardless of the percentage, it is still your interpretation, and therefore your opinion, as to how this reflects upon his character.
Quote:
I know it's Vox, which you'll likely dismiss for being emotional or something, but they break down both Ford's and Kavanaugh's testimonies, and highlight every question answered directly, and every question evaded.
Vox has their own opinion as to why Kavanaugh didn't answer every question, which is of course influenced by their own left-wing bias.
