Nicker on 22/9/2018 at 04:43
She's taking a pretty huge personal and professional risk just to sabotage a nominee. But why won't Kavanaugh agree to an investigation? He's got trump rooting for him. What could go wrong?
Starker on 22/9/2018 at 04:53
If she has nothing, then it would become clear to the FBI very quickly. And they have experts for interviewing reluctant witnesses.
Anyway, looks like someone has it out for Rosenstein:
Quote:
(
https://www.vox.com/2018/9/21/17887672/rod-rosenstein-trump-recording-25th-amendment-times)
Did Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein seriously suggest to top Justice Department officials last year that someone should secretly tape President Donald Trump?
Or did he make an obviously sarcastic comment that he never intended anyone take seriously?
A new report from the New York Times's Adam Goldman and Michael Schmidt says it was the former — and adds that Rosenstein also talked about invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. (Neither ended up happening.) The reporters' sources are anonymous people “briefed either on the events themselves or on memos” written by former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe and others.
But a separate report from the Washington Post's Devlin Barrett and Matt Zapotosky quotes an anonymous source who was in the room and disputes the account given to the Times. Per this source, Rosenstein was rebutting a suggestion by McCabe that the Justice Department open an investigation into Trump, and said something along the lines of, “What do you want to do, Andy, wire the president?”
Who's right? The consequences could be enormous. It was Rosenstein who appointed Mueller as special counsel back in May 2017, and it's Rosenstein who continues to oversee Mueller's Russia investigation. Well before these new stories President Trump has privately mused about firing Rosenstein (or Sessions, or Mueller), so he could put someone he views as more loyal in charge of the Russia probe.
Trump has hesitated on actually following through with this. The new Times report, though, will undoubtedly infuriate the president — and could well provide him with the pretext he's long sought to justify Rosenstein's firing, and provoke a showdown over the future of Mueller's probe. And in the moments after the Times published it, speculation about a new Saturday Night Massacre once again arose in Washington.
jkcerda on 22/9/2018 at 04:57
Quote Posted by Nicker
She's taking a pretty huge personal and professional risk just to sabotage a nominee. But why won't Kavanaugh agree to an investigation? He's got trump rooting for him. What could go wrong?
Oh please. She has a gofund me page to fleece the suckers , again there are a gazillion holes in her story as shown Kav has NOTHING to gain here. Delaying the confirmation does not work in his favor
The FBI is full of crooked idiots.
Starker. Should they water board those unwilling to comply?:p
Starker on 22/9/2018 at 05:03
Yeah, anything to discredit her. Someone set up a gofundme page for her? Well, that just proves that she's only motivated by money.
Never mind that the funds go to pay for her security and any extra money will be donated.
jkcerda on 22/9/2018 at 05:07
She discredited herself , you have to be pretty desperate to believe her.
Starker on 22/9/2018 at 05:09
You are pretty desperate to discredit her.
jkcerda on 22/9/2018 at 05:14
Pointing out the many obvious flaws in her BS story , I'm not in the senate or the hearings. My post have no bearing on her credibility .
Starker on 22/9/2018 at 05:16
You have repeatedly attacked her motives and her character based on nothing but the presumption that she has to be lying.
Hell, the few last pages are full of you repeating the same points over and over and over again how she is not to be trusted and that it has to be a ploy.
jkcerda on 22/9/2018 at 05:18
All based on the bullshit she spewed and her crazy demands
Starker on 22/9/2018 at 05:24
Are these demands really all that crazy in light of what happened to Anita Hill?
