Obama FAILS to deliver peace to the world, REWARDED by Norwegian Nobel Committee - by Koki
Muzman on 10/10/2009 at 13:07
(For a brief chuckle; scroll through the 'more from drinking with bob' panel)
Anyway, first they give homeopath kook Bill Maher the Richard Dawkins award and now this.
I'll never trust another awards ceremony.
elkston on 10/10/2009 at 16:29
Not sure if you're trying to be funny or not. I'm not laughing either way.
fett on 11/10/2009 at 02:11
Why aren't inbreeding penalties more rigid?
Tocky on 11/10/2009 at 03:05
Because it is self penalizing?
I did get a bit of a laugh out of the Taliban spokesman saying he should have gotten the award for escalating violence and killing civillians. Obama is no where near as black as that pot.
CCCToad on 11/10/2009 at 03:47
I wouldn't worry too much about that guy, I predict death by stroke within the next four months.
uncadonego on 11/10/2009 at 09:28
I just finished watching Chris Matthews. There's a few minutes left, and they're going to talk about whether Obama can "earn it", even though he's already won it. For me, the head scratcher was this; the deadline for nominations was when he was only in office for two weeks.:confused:
rachel on 11/10/2009 at 14:23
He had a life before the White House, you know...
uncadonego on 11/10/2009 at 14:31
the committee referred to his last nine months as prez, even though he'd been nominated after 11 days as prez.
fett on 11/10/2009 at 15:29
This is the best commentary so far on the whole thing. It gave me a little more context and now I'm of the opinion that yes, he did deserve the prize, based on it's history and intent.
(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJuEOaF84o
nickie on 11/10/2009 at 15:50
No doubt in a minority of 1, I think he deserves it if only because, for me, the US is no longer the scariest nation on earth.
