a flower in hell on 22/2/2008 at 23:45
I want a cookie.
catbarf on 23/2/2008 at 01:07
Quote Posted by mopgoblin
To me it seems more like you have trouble dealing with anyone who attacks your arguments, but does not take a strong position on the issue itself. You can't bring yourself to back down on the "guns are bad simply because they have destructive power" point, even though it's inconsistent with the implications of your "What are cars designed for?" post. Since you're not up against a strong ideological position here, you don't have the opportunity to dodge the issue by attacking some other point. When you can't find a way to attack the opposing arguments, you start attacking the people behind them instead.
What career are you in?
mopgoblin on 23/2/2008 at 01:22
I'm still at university. I used to study maths and computer science, but after a dicey honours year I switched to political science and gender studies.
catbarf on 23/2/2008 at 01:28
Quote Posted by mopgoblin
I'm still at university. I used to study maths and computer science, but after a dicey honours year I switched to political science and gender studies.
Interesting. Thanks for the response.
Scots Taffer on 23/2/2008 at 01:34
Quote Posted by mopgoblin
I'm still at university. I used to study maths and computer science, but after a dicey honours year I switched to political science and gender studies.
Read as: HOLY SHIT REAL WORLD IMMINENT ABORT ABORT
fett on 23/2/2008 at 14:11
Yeah, I remember how the world so much easier to solve in my political science class. Then all the people started moving around and doing stuff. It's why I still hate the fucking Sims games.
The_Raven on 23/2/2008 at 19:26
Fett, I'm having some trouble trying to decipher that message. I can't even decide if it is supposed to be a double entendre or not.
fett on 23/2/2008 at 20:41
Open to interpretation.
SubJeff on 24/2/2008 at 08:05
Quote Posted by mopgoblin
You can't bring yourself to back down on the "guns are bad simply because they have destructive power" point, even though it's inconsistent with the implications of your "What are cars designed for?" post.
This is enough demonstration of your failed logic for me to not bother discussing it with you. Guns are made to kill and are very good at causing serious injury. If you cannot divorce that from the idea of any other item being dangerous as a by-product of it's function what point is there discussing it with you people? Why do governments even bother with recording gun crime? Because those crimes have a unique element that is controllable to some extent. Graduate from uni, then come back and play.