Sypha Nadon on 29/4/2008 at 17:52
I used to be a very prolific reader, but that kind of changed when I started working at Barnes & Noble in 2004. After working with books all day, I found that upon arriving home from work the last thing I would usually want to do was look at another book. Sadly, I was buying more and more books at the time, taking advantage of my employee discount as it were. Last year in particular I barely read any books at all, with the exception of some Nietzsche, Rand's "The Fountainhead", and so forth. So I resolved in 2008 to slough off my reading inertia and try to read at least 50 books, mainly focusing on books that I've had on my shelf for awhile now yet never got around to. I also resolved that each year from now on I'll pick an author whose work I've been wanting to read for awhile now yet kept putting off, and read as many of their books as I could. This year, I decided the author would be Thomas Pynchon. Anyway, it's been four months and I've already reached the halfway point of my goal, though I haven't read all that much Pynchon (yet). Here's what I've read thus far:
1. "The City and the Pillar" (Gore Vidal) (finished Jan. 3)
2. "Sway" (Zachary Lazar) (finished Jan. 9)
3. "Paradoxia" (Lydia Lunch) (finished Jan. 12)
4. "Eden Eden Eden" (Pierre Guyotat) (finished Jan. 23)
5. "Jack the Modernist" (Robert Gluck) (finished Jan. 25)
6. "The Maimed" (Hermann Ungar) (finished Jan. 25)
7. "The Stranger" (Albert Camus) (finished Jan. 26)
8. "Less Than Zero" (Bret Easton Ellis) (finished Jan. 30) *
9. "The Torture Garden" (Octave Mirbeau) (finished Jan. 31)
10. "Zombie" (Joyce Carol Oates) (finished Jan. 31)
11. "The Atrocity Exhibition" (J.G. Ballard) (finished Feb. 7)
12. "Play it as it Lays" (Joan Didion) (finished Feb. 10)
13. "The Blind Owl" (Sadegh Hedayat) (finished Feb. 10)
14. "La-Bas" (J.K. Huysmans) (finished Feb. 15) *
15. "Against Nature" (J.K. Huysmans) (finished Feb. 22)
16. "Moravagine" (Blaise Cendrars) (finished Feb. 29)
17. "Briefing for a Descent Into Hell" (Doris Lessing) (March 14)
18. "In a Glass Darkly" (Sheridan Le Fanu) (finished March 18)
19. "The Weaklings" (Dennis Cooper) (finished March 22)
20. "The Mage's Holiday" (Tom Champagne) (April)
21. "Invisible Cities" (Italo Calvino) (finished April 9)
22. "Exercises in Style" (Raymond Queneau) (finished April 17)
23. "The Wild Boys" (William S. Burroughs) (finished April 21) *
24. "Downstream" (J.K. Huysmans) (finished April 21)
25. "The Crying of Lot 49" (Thomas Pynchon) (finished April 27)
* = book I've read at least once in the past
(I should add here that I usually read more than one book at the same time, hence why there are a few days where I finished reading two books on that day)
Currently reading: Alistair McCartney's "The End of the World Book" and Umberto Eco's "Foucault's Pendulum" (why I've put this latter one off for years now is beyond me, as the subject matter is right up my alley).
In the wings: The "Illuminatus" trilogy (which I've read before but want to read again), Steven Millhauser's "Edwin Mullhouse", Luke Rhinehart's "The Dice Man", and of course, more Pynchon... I might try "Gravity's Rainbow" over the summer. I amy have to take a small break soon though as allergies have been aggravating my eyes and I've been finding it very tough to read recently, though I did read like 200 pages of "Pendulum" yesterday.
henke on 29/4/2008 at 17:59
Holy hell, boy. That's a lot of books.
I've read... um, I'm reading "Monsignor Quixote" by Graham Greene, started it last week. On, like, page 100 now. I read "Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde" last christmas and a third of Michael Moore's "Stupid White Men" before it just got too angry and predictable.
Hier on 29/4/2008 at 18:07
I've not read anything on your list but I have read, and loved, Foccault's Pendulum. Since you say it's up your alley, is there anything on your list there that you'd recommend as being comparable to Eco?
SubJeff on 29/4/2008 at 18:23
Good lord that's a lot Sypha. There are a few on there I'd like to read someday but I hardly read at all now. I did read African Psycho and The number 1 ladies detective agency his year though. I have Capitalist N*gger (anyone seeing a pattern here?) and The Trail waiting.
Sypha Nadon on 29/4/2008 at 18:28
"American Psycho" SE? That book's one of my all-time favorites, and I try to read it at least once a year.
Hier, "Foucault's Pendulum" reminds me (a bit) of the "Illuminatus" trilogy which came out back in the 70's. It also reminds me a bit of another of my favorite novels, J.K. Huysmans "La-Bas" (which I re-read this year). "La-Bas" (which came out back in 1891) is kind of obscure now yet was a bestseller in France back in the day. It deals with a quirky group of social outcasts who are obsessed with the Middle Ages, Gilles de Rais, Satanism and the Black Mass, occultism, and conspiracy theories in general (just as it seems that the characters in Eco's book are obsessed with the Templars and the occult). Huysmans isn't for everyone though as not a whole lot happens in his books, it's mostly lots of dialogue and long descriptions. But he was certainly the greatest of the 19th century French Decadent writers, and his classic "Against Nature" was a huge inspiration for Oscar Wilde's "Picture of Dorian Gray."
SubJeff on 29/4/2008 at 18:32
No, African Psycho. African. I read American Psycho years ago.
Hier on 29/4/2008 at 18:40
Yeah I've been meaning to read Illuminatus for a while now.
Got anything, uh, more accessible than Huysmans? :D It's not that I'm stupid--at least I don't think I am--it's just that I do most of my reading on public transit, so my concentration level isn't infinite. Foccault's Pendulum took me longer than usual--you know, the ol' "I didn't follow anything on that last page so I have to read it again" ordeal.
Incidentally, if you like Eco, Baudolino is another of his that I really liked. A much easier read than either FP or Name of the Rose, and it's quite funny too. Definitely a lighter offering than some of his other stuff.
frozenman on 29/4/2008 at 21:05
If you're going with more Pynchon I'd place my vote for Against the Day rather than Gravity's Rainbow. Maybe I just didn't focus enough on Gravity's Rainbow, or it eluded me (certainly if read one of these behemoths it requires dedication), but Against the Day was just more enjoyable in my opinion. GR has a kind of hallucinogenic narrative and often I would be reading quite clearly (without distraction) and end up 2 pages later not knowing what the fuck happened.
On the other hand AtD is a bit more straightforward, but the subject matter can often be intense (it helps in reading to have a basic knowledge of relativity, Minkowski space, complex analysis, etc...). Also, AtD could easily have been published as 3 or 4 seperate novels, it's that long...
BTW Sypha, check out Alastair Gray if you get a chance. I imagine he'd suit you nicely.
heretic on 29/4/2008 at 22:22
If you've read Fountainhead, why not go for 'Atlas Shrugged'? It's much more well written, and not nearly as sporadic. Even for non-objectivists it's a beautiful insight into an interesting and thought-provoking philosophy.
Edit: Unless you allready have of course.
demagogue on 30/4/2008 at 02:58
I'd add to the list, let's see, Paulo Coelho, Kazuo Ishiguro (Remains of the Day, Never Let Me Go), Salmon Rushdie, Haruki Murakami, Natsume Soseki, Nikos Kazantzakis, Jorge L Borges of course
And there is something to be said for the less obvious classics ... Augustine's Confessions, Thucidites Peloponeasian War, Lucretius Nature of Things, Rousseau's Emilie, Gogol's Dead Souls, Stendahl's Red & Black, Lautreamont's Maldoror, Montesque's Persian Letters, Sacher-Masoch's Venus in Furs, anything by Zola, Turgenev's Father & Sons, essays by Paul Valery or Lionel Trilling or Paul Tillich...
Also, for some reason I've become fascinated with 18th-19th century academic treatises, which you can get off Guggenheim Project ... Malthus, Darwin, Huxley ... or on archaeology, anthropology, comparative religion, sociology, politics ... On the one hand they can be so hilariously biased. On the other, it's fascinating to sense that our whole modern outlook stands on their shoulders.
I keep hearing that Gravity's Rainbow is supposed to be the standard-bearer for postmod lit, so you're supposed to read it whether you understand it or not ... that and Joyce's Ulysses. It helps that both of them now have their own wiki sites, that seriously take you page by page, sentence by sentence, in Ulysses case often word by word, through them. I can't imagine I could have trudged through Ulysses without it. And I think whenever I get to GR I'll have to use its wiki, too. Crutch or not, it at least makes things comprehensible and worth reading.