Phydeaux on 1/3/2006 at 14:40
See, now you're just being a pedantic dick and arguing semantics.
I NEVER spoke about Brits being able to carry a knife with the intent of self defense. YOU (and some other people) infered that I was talking about using a knife to defend oneself. The only mention I made about this subject was in response to somebody else, where I said that a knife is a pretty bad idea. The only other mentions I made of defending oneself was regarding non-lethal options like pepper spray or a taser.
The only times I mentioned "rights" were in regards to a person being able own and carry a knife, without being restricted to certain types. I might not have specified "for utility use", but I certainly never said anything about "for self defense". Yet you implied that I was (
http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1412786#post1412786) here.
I (as well as Jennie&Tim) called you out on this, yet you're clinging on to your position (whatever it is, all I can figure out is that you're being an argumentitive prick) based on semantics.
That's your clue to learn to fucking read and/or STFU, in case that passed you by as well.
Quote Posted by Shug
That's utterly fantastic. Great to hear
Now if you could just explain to the British government why they care if some guy in America has never attacked anybody with a knife greater than 3" in size I'm sure this whole terrible misunderstanding would simply blow right over
Way to miss the whole point. Maybe I was too abstract, or maybe you don't like to think, so I'll explain for you.
The way Naartjie worded
Quote:
3) WHAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE...is to carry things like flick knives, butterfly knives, or anything over 3", which could have no conceivable use outside of your kitchen or work studio or wherever you actually *need* them, other than stabbing someone.
implies that there's something intrinsic about the knife that makes it dangerous. Perhaps, even that simply by picking up such a knife, I'll start stabbing people (but surely, he couldn't be implying something as idiotic as that--I'll give him the benifit of the doubt).
The balisong I carry (Bradley Mayhem) has titanium handles that are sandblasted to make them grippy, and is contured to fit the hand. The spine of the blade has thumb ridges for grip. The S30V blade holds an edge very well, and is sharp enough to shave a gnat's ballsack. The blade is broad, unlike my old Benchmade 42 (which tends to bind when slicing cardboard) and slices very well. Most importantly, a balisong can be opened with one hand, from pretty much any grip, and doesn't require it to be locked to be safe. One has to only keep the handles gripped tightly, and there's no way the knife can fold on you. I don't have to spend time locking/unlocking the knife to use it safely. This knife is, in most aspects, a very well built, and very utilitarian knife.
That's why I carry a balisong, and this one in particular. Plus, it's fun and it gives me something for my hands to do when I'm bored.
What the knife
doesn't do is instill me with an uncontrollable compullsion to stab people. It doesn't instill me with thoughts of criminality. The fact that it's a butteryfly knife in no way whatsoever makes it, or me with it, a danger to anybody. It has and serves many "conceivable uses", as Naartjie put it, that have nothing to do with stabbing people.
The knife is an object. It is a tool. It can be used as a weapon, but so can a tire iron or SUV. If only Chevy Blazers were used in road rage incidents, would you ban Chevy Blazers? Of course not, that's stupid. So why ban certain knives? Because of after-the-fact association with criminals? If it makes you feel safer, then fine, go ahead, live in your delusional "safe" world where your laws
really do make a difference. Just don't come crying to me next time somebody mugs you with a flick knife.
PigLick on 1/3/2006 at 14:49
dont thank me, thank the knife!
SubJeff on 1/3/2006 at 15:03
Quote:
implies that there's something intrinsic about the knife that makes it dangerous
Of course it does, because there is. Objects can have properties seperate from the intention of the user. Butterfly and flick knifes are easily concealable and easily deployable - that is the issue with them. This an intrinsic property of the type of knife and the reason why they are illegal in the UK. Similarly; guns - high damage, long range, rapid fire/damage potential. All intrinsic properties of the item regardless of who is holding it.
To ignore the fact of intrisic "dangerousness" is to be pigheaded or clueless about these situtations.
Quote:
The balisong I carry (Bradley Mayhem) has titanium handles blah blah blah
Way to go on the ebladepenis, your description really helps us see your point of view and not think you are some knife obsessed nut.
Quote:
I NEVER spoke about Brits being able to carry a knife with the intent of self defense... ... Just don't come crying to me next time somebody mugs you with a flick knife
Does not compute.
Phydeaux on 1/3/2006 at 15:05
I guess I should mention that the US isn't exactly a knife-knut's utopia either, especially in some states. Only a few allow balisongs, and even fewer allow automatics (Arizona is one of the few). There's plenty of idiotic namby-pamby legislation here, and none of it does any good here either. It's not the UK that I'm against, it's idiotic namby-pamby legislation that I'm against. I only single out the UK because their laws slightly more namby-pambier and idiotic. No locking/fixed knives? No thanks, I think I'll keep my fingers where they are (attatched). And I'm truely happy that the pointy kitchen knife ban failed.
jay pettitt on 1/3/2006 at 15:10
Quote Posted by Myoldnamebroke
I think they're outlawed in the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959. It's because you can flick them open like a switch blade, it's just the force to open the blade comes from gravity not from a spring or something.
Then that would be a gravity knife - which is illegal. Locking knives like D'Juhn Keep's have a folding action (at least they do if they're like my multi-tool thingy), but arn't considered folding because of the addition of a locking mechanism - and thus become a fixed blade. They're legal, but you need good reason to carry one in a public place.
(
http://www.hrcr.org/safrica/arrested_rights/Harris_DirPubPros.htm)
clicky
SubJeff on 1/3/2006 at 15:24
Quote Posted by Phydeaux
I only single out the UK because their laws slightly more namby-pambier and idiotic. No locking/fixed knives? No thanks, I think I'll keep my fingers where they are (attatched). And I'm truely happy that the pointy kitchen knife ban failed.
Well the self-injury epidemic never happened so can I assume that your insistance is related to some cack-handedness on your part?
In other news - Shock horror: accidental injuries that don't seem to be a problem ranked as less important than keeping easily concealable weapons out of criminals hands!
Would you
really take out your knife if you were confronted by a mugger with a knife? Really? I doubt it because if he brought it to you you know it would really be on.
Phydeaux on 1/3/2006 at 15:26
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
Of course it does, because there is. Objects can have properties seperate from the intention of the user. Butterfly and flick knifes are easily concealable and easily deployable - that is the issue with them. This an intrinsic property of the type of knife and the reason why they are illegal in the UK. Similarly; guns - high damage, long range, rapid fire/damage potential. All intrinsic properties of the item regardless of who is holding it.
To ignore the fact of intrisic "dangerousness" is to be pigheaded or clueless about these situtations.
To deploy a butterfly knife, you have to remove it from your pocket, squeeze the handles to release the latch, deftly whirl the handle and blade around, and position it for use (and maybe latch it closed). This takes practice to learn, and it takes time to do. I'm relatively practiced (not much with tricks, but opening/closing I've got down pat), but it still takes me longer to open my balisong than it would for me to pull my Swiss Army knife out of my pocket and open it with two hands.
Similarly, a "flick knife", at least the typical one that I linked above, has a saftey slider that has to be disengaged (if you don't engage it when it's in your pocket, you'll probably have the knife blade in your leg) and the button has to be pressed. Probably about as time consuming as opening any other folding knife.
Even if I grant you the point that certain knives might be easier/qucicker to deploy, the point I originally made before we got off on tangents, is that the laws banning these knives do nothing to stop the crime. Do you think that if you legalized them, muggings and stabbings would
increase?
Quote:
Way to go on the ebladepenis, your description really helps us see your point of view and not think you are some knife obsessed nut.
I never claimed not to be a knife obsessed nut. Well, maybe not quite obsessed, but definitely extremely enthusiastic. I have my hobbies, you have yours. However I still make the claim that I'm not a stab-happy switchblade wielding maniac.
Quote:
Does not compute.
Quote:
I NEVER spoke about Brits being able to carry a knife with the intent of self defense... ... Just don't come crying to me next time somebody mugs you with a flick knife
JFC, how many times do I have to repeat myself? I'm talking about the
LAWS not having
ANY AFFECT on
CRIME. If the
WORKED, theFonz would have been
FUCKING MUGGED with a
FLICK KNIFE!
Phydeaux on 1/3/2006 at 15:35
Quote Posted by Myself
Well done. Smartest thing you could have done. Charge a gun, run from a knife.
Quote Posted by Myself
But running away is still the best choice. Giving the mugger what he wants is the second best choice. Waaaaay down at the bottom of the list is getting into a knife fight. Anybody who thinks that they can win a knife fight is a delusional moron (unless they know escrima or something). This ain't the movies. I'd rather have a sturdy flashlight or a walking stick than a knife if I had to defend myself against somebody with a knife. The best tools however are still a cool head and a good pair of shoes.
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
Would you
really take out your knife if you were confronted by a mugger with a knife? Really? I doubt it because if he brought it to you you know it would really be on.
Huh? :confused: Are we having the same conversation here? Or are you talking with the same fictional character Naartje seems to be talking to?
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
Well the self-injury epidemic never happened so can I assume that your insistance is related to some cack-handedness on your part?
Are you refering to the 3 stitchs and permanent nerve damage on my index finger because of a locking knife that failed and foldied on me?
Do you wear a seatbelt whilst driving a car?
Surely you don't need to take a college class in causality to appreciate preventative safety. Even if you don't/can't/won't appreciate preventative safety in an avocation you obviously know nothing about, surely you can defer such decisions to be made by people who do?
Shug on 1/3/2006 at 15:47
Quote Posted by PigLick
dont thank me, thank the knife!
Brought to you by the same genius recommending one should charge a gun
Phydeaux on 1/3/2006 at 15:50
Bullets run faster than you can. But giving him your money/phone/whatever probably is a better idea.