AR Master on 14/1/2010 at 17:21
ok
SubJeff on 14/1/2010 at 18:26
That is pretty impressive.
Fingernail on 14/1/2010 at 18:32
It's the sort of trompe l'oeil of CGI though, it's not doing anything besides replicating (very well) what you could shoot with a real camera in the real world, which is interesting up to a point, but I think more interesting is what impossible worlds and situations you could create to look as convincing as this does.
Aja on 14/1/2010 at 18:47
now there's a man who appreciates a good narrow depth of field
Sulphur on 14/1/2010 at 18:48
Quote Posted by Fingernail
It's the sort of trompe l'oeil of CGI though, it's not doing anything besides replicating (very well) what you could shoot with a real camera in the real world, which is interesting up to a point, but I think more interesting is what impossible worlds and situations you could create to look as convincing as this does.
To be fair, it does do that later on with the floating water spheres and the (slightly ridiculous) building flexing its outer spines, at which point the illusion of reality is immediately and very convincingly shattered.
I'm impressed that this is all one guy's work. The camera work is sublime. With some over-abuse of focal blur and DOF, yeah. But still nicely done. Very art for art's sake, but what's wrong with that? The man's got talent. It's really, really hard to believe that those fields and the forest were generated inside a computer. Fantastic stuff. :thumb:
Fingernail on 14/1/2010 at 18:49
Did you really think I watched the whole thing before forming an opinion?
You need to learn me better, boy.
Sulphur on 14/1/2010 at 18:50
You got the money, I got the time.
june gloom on 14/1/2010 at 20:03
but who has the butter
icemann on 15/1/2010 at 10:08
wow
