Kolya on 27/3/2009 at 01:45
Bad art isn't the opposite of photorealism. I really thought we'd gotten over this.
Edit: Now you're not quoting me anymore I look like a case of tourette. Oh well.
Aja on 27/3/2009 at 01:52
Sorry; it was up for (literally) five seconds before I realized it wasn't actually a response to anything you said :o
I think I was going for something along the lines of "technically AND artistically unimpressive" but now that's obvious, isn't it.
Scots Taffer on 27/3/2009 at 01:59
You guys are all pretty wrong, this is quite clearly some good pop art.
Aja on 27/3/2009 at 02:05
I meant MOBA. Oh how this forum structure exacerbates my poor communication skills. I like the Bernardi art. His magazine WIP painting is impossible to recognize as such.
Unless YOU meant MOBA.
Scots Taffer on 27/3/2009 at 02:08
BEAR and Kolya sitting in a photorealistic tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g
kidmystik101 on 27/3/2009 at 02:21
Scots, I think you'll find that a lot of artists don't appreciate Photorealistic paintings. Sure they're amazing in quality and the skill required is phenominal, but why not just take a picture? Same freakin' thing!
Starrfall on 27/3/2009 at 02:34
It IS boring. I wouldn't say it has no artistic merit, but it's boring. I mean if van gogh had been a photorealist then cafe terrace wouldn't be up in our bathroom, you know?
The street paintings are rad though.
ercles on 27/3/2009 at 02:36
Might want to whack a NSFW tag on that link champ.
Chade on 27/3/2009 at 02:41
What's the difference between staring slack-jawed at a process and staring slack-jawed at a product?
Either way, my mouth is still sitting there waiting to be picked up off the floor.
jtr7 on 27/3/2009 at 02:51
Still life and art class lessons taken to the nth degree.
