Random_Taffer on 27/3/2009 at 00:19
Holy fuck!
How'd he?
That is...really cool.
Kolya on 27/3/2009 at 00:47
Pfft, what's the point?
It's a display of technical painting skills with no artistic merit whatsoever.
And it's boring.
Nameless Voice on 27/3/2009 at 01:16
The criteria by which people consider something to be "art" vary widely from person to person.
Where one person might think that the design of an object in a computer game is art, another might say that such a thing can't possibly be considered art because it's merely computer-generated. Which one is right?
[/Pointless ramble of obvious facts]
Kolya on 27/3/2009 at 01:25
I like the street art pictures. Unfortunately I've only seen this stuff on the net before and never in real life. Must be great to see how the illusion pops in and out depending on your view point.
BEAR on 27/3/2009 at 01:25
Hate to say it, but I'm with Koyla on this one. I'm can't really see the point. Its great and all that he can do that, but already having photos, photorealistic stuff seems kind of useless.
I fucking love those streetpaintings though.
Thief13x on 27/3/2009 at 01:29
I think one of the (maybe less obvious) techniques not so commonly used by painters is the accuracy of the reflections. Notice that in pretty much all the paintings, reflection plays a big role, and without it or if it was less impeccable it wouldn't be nearly as impressive. Nice find
