Thief13x on 11/12/2009 at 16:18
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
2. Because I hate solid potential that turns into something pathetic, which is precisely why I don't like you.
I
refuse to take the bait and mention my degree:p
Aerothorn on 11/12/2009 at 19:11
Quote Posted by Fafhrd
But was there no discussion of the verdict after it was made? There's no real risk of 'lessening the educational value of the exercise' if the educational value is zero because you're not discussing the mock trial after it's done.
And I know that you said this isn't a law class, but that the professor apparently didn't lay out some basic standards of judicial objectivity (and competence, based on judge A and B) shows pretty clearly that this wasn't an exercise he should've been running in the first place.
Actually, the TA (who was running this exercise) gave a whole objectiveity lecture to the judges, etc. One of them just chose to ignore it and the other one was a moron. But yes, I agree that it was wrong of them to not cover the results afterwards.
Starrfall on 12/12/2009 at 03:05
Aerothorn didn't you know that americans abroad are required to be as obnoxious as possible in EVERY SITUATION how dare you not complain?
SubJeff on 12/12/2009 at 10:59
at least he would have got away with it :mad:
Shug on 12/12/2009 at 12:57
yo prof give me my FUCKING CHEESEBURGER AND FRIES
I love how there was more discussion about the injustice done to Aero than anything else related to the case
SubJeff on 12/12/2009 at 14:14
Or how the lecturer is called Prof. Is he really a Prof? I think I met about 5 actually Professors in my entire uni life/career.
Aerothorn on 13/12/2009 at 22:23
I am almost certain he is NOT a professor - he certainly never used that title. But in the USA all faculty are called professors, so I'm used to say it - sometimes I'll think better of it but not usually.
Of course I'm back in the USA now so I CAN SAY IT ALL I WANT WOOO
