lizardfuel55 on 16/12/2004 at 12:38
I say, why doesn't this forum have ranks? I'm not saying I'm for it, but it's usually a tradition for forum members to be ranked on the basis of how many posts they've uh...posted. Just wonderin'. Thanks! :p
David on 16/12/2004 at 12:50
Post count is not important, why should a member with 3000 posts be ranked higher than someone with 300 or 30? There is none, therefore we stick with two member ranks: New Member (<= 30 posts) and Member (>30 posts).
Do you post every single thing you thing of? It sure seems like it.
Eshaktaar on 16/12/2004 at 12:52
But there are: "New Member" and "Member"
More ranks aren't needed IMO, as they'd just encourage the intellectually less endowed people to post spam for the sake of upping their post count. TTLG is not that kind of forum.
lizardfuel55 on 16/12/2004 at 12:54
Quote Posted by David
Post count is not important, why should a member with 3000 posts be ranked higher than someone with 300 or 30? There is none, therefore we stick with two member ranks: New Member (<= 30 posts) and Member (>30 posts).
Do you post every single thing you thing of? It sure seems like it.
Well, I just happen to think a lot.
dj_ivocha on 16/12/2004 at 13:23
:laff: :laff:
lizardfuel55 on 16/12/2004 at 13:31
All right, I'm sorry (This'l probably be my last post for 5 days now).
TF on 16/12/2004 at 14:03
Posts are okay, it's the new threads that irk.
Tumbleweed on 16/12/2004 at 15:50
Actually, the posts irk too.
lizardfuel55 on 16/12/2004 at 16:11
Quote Posted by Tumbleweed
Actually, the posts irk too.
Well then, get over it.