SubJeff on 5/4/2007 at 07:43
But I oppose free speach. Free speech on the other hand...
These guys are harmless idiots. Unless they actually DO something apart from wasting their own time leave them alone.
It's the kids I feel sorry for. The kids!
TheHurley on 5/4/2007 at 07:45
i cant seem to spell when im pissed off....
SD on 5/4/2007 at 07:54
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
These guys are harmless idiots.
They're quite clearly not.
Aja on 5/4/2007 at 08:33
Homeless for the winter?
Are you implying that your plan is to wait until they're out of the house before you set it ablaze?
Headcleaner on 5/4/2007 at 09:00
You're as bad as they are when you make flip-switch judgements supported by popular morality.
They feel they're as correct as you feel you are.
The whole 'destroy that which I dislike' seems to be the main idea of their cause too.
Muzman on 5/4/2007 at 09:14
Oh man, that is plain hilarious.
I remember the name Fred Phelps from years ago. The man, and now his brood I guess, are legendary nutbars.
I laughed my arse off at the timing of Gaybriel's appearance
Vivian on 5/4/2007 at 09:26
I thought their 'fag priest' sign was amazing. Do you think they'd make me a t-shirt if I promised that I hated liz taylor as well? Fag Enabler! Fag Sweden! (What?).
I dunno about these guys - they're quite close to classical stoicism in some respects, but in other respects they're hilarious retards. Their 'none-violence' mantra (which they do seem to stick to) raises them above similar foaming zealots and prevents me from getting too riled up about them. 'FAG DOOM' is quite a catchy catchphrase also.
SD on 5/4/2007 at 11:54
As much as I dislike them, I do have a grudging respect for their integrity. They're in a very small minority of Christians who actually follow the text they purport to believe in to the absolute letter.
Convict on 5/4/2007 at 12:06
Quote Posted by Strontium Dog
As much as I dislike them, I do have a grudging respect for their integrity. They're in a very small minority of Christians who actually follow the text they purport to believe in to the absolute letter.
But it was pointed out by the journalist that they aren't, surely?