Ixitixl on 19/6/2009 at 18:32
:o
june gloom on 19/6/2009 at 18:49
To be fair, sarcasm meters don't work properly here.
Thief13x on 20/6/2009 at 05:27
my sarcasm meter is off the charts
AR Master on 20/6/2009 at 06:32
so's my boner
Sgt_BFG on 20/6/2009 at 08:05
schwing
snowcap21 on 20/6/2009 at 10:09
His profile says Immortal visited these forums yesterday, so he seems to be ok for now :)
SubJeff on 20/6/2009 at 10:40
Doesn't mean its actually him though.
SD on 20/6/2009 at 12:55
Quote Posted by raph
It's a sovereign nation, period.
Seriously how hard is it to understand?
I understand it perfectly, it's just a cowardly and immoral way of conducting foreign policy: "Don't threaten our territory or our interests and you can do what you like to your own citizens".
For me, concern for individual freedom, liberty and personal welfare does not stop at the borders of my nation. If the people of Iran are going to revolt against what is as cruel, despotic and tyrannical a regime as has ever existed on the surface of this earth, we should be giving them all the assistance we can muster.
Unfortunately we seem determined to play into the hands of the Iranian government, even insofar as we were prepared to call this charade an "election" in the first place.
Chimpy Chompy on 20/6/2009 at 13:04
Stronts have you had some big change of ideology over the years? I could have sworn you weren't a fan of the occupation of Iraq.
rachel on 20/6/2009 at 13:18
So go to Iran SD. And gee, why stop there? There are plenty more, go to Somalia. Myanmar. North Korea. And all the others.
I hear you and I agree it sucks, but you're not the world police. Invading sovereign countries because you don't agree is not the solution, it's war, and it makes things worse, not better.
