fett on 25/11/2009 at 06:39
I think what gunny's trying to say is that no doesn't always mean no. :confused:
Tocky on 26/11/2009 at 03:56
How can you say no to a face like that? Everybody likes a monkey on meth.
OnionBob on 26/11/2009 at 10:18
Quote Posted by BEAR
Yeah.....raped....
lol yeah they love it really!!!
gunsmoke on 26/11/2009 at 11:35
Quote Posted by fett
I think what gunny's trying to say is that no doesn't always mean no. :confused:
My girlfriend and I were talking about this. We came to the conclusion that it was probably easier for her to say "Raped by Manson" and get some sympathy, than for her to say 'fucked the shit out of Manson" and be ignored.
Kolya on 26/11/2009 at 11:44
The fact that she had a motive for her claim is no evidence that it's untrue, it's not even a good hint, given what we know about Charlie.
I'm not saying the claim is true either, I'm just saying we don't know. And that includes BEAR, you and your girlfriend. So maybe we all better shut up about it.
On a sidenote, Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme was released August 14th this year.
OnionBob on 26/11/2009 at 11:57
Quote Posted by Kolya
The fact that she had a motive for her claim is no evidence that it's untrue, it's not even a good hint, given what we know about Charlie.
I'm not saying the claim is true either, I'm just saying we don't know. And that includes BEAR, you and your girlfriend. So maybe we all better shut up about it.
On a sidenote, Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme was released August 14th this year.
it's awesome that in the face of choosing between believing whether a woman was raped by one of the most violent psychopaths in criminal history and whether she 'wanted it really', given no other evidence, the automatic assumption is the latter, and with the addendum that SHE'S SAYING SHE WAS RAPED TO GET ATTENTION
THAT'S WHAT THEY DO
WOMEN
THAT'S HOW THEY ACT
YOU KNOW HOW THEY DO
no need for feminism guys! equality has been achieved! we're all living in a postgender utopiaaaaaaaaa~
Aerothorn on 26/11/2009 at 12:19
well see his girlfriend agrees and she is a woman and therefore it is okay
Kolya on 26/11/2009 at 12:21
Not sure why you quoted me there, OnionBob. I generally agree with you, but no one her said she wanted attention. I think it can be assumed that in retrospect she doesn't feel to good about her connection with Manson. But like I said, that doesn't falsify her claim.
OnionBob on 26/11/2009 at 12:26
Quote Posted by Kolya
Not sure why you quoted me there, OnionBob. I generally agree with you, but no one her said she wanted attention. I think it can be assumed that in retrospect she doesn't feel to good about her connection with Manson. But like I said, that doesn't falsify her claim.
i was agreeing with you dummy
and contingently conflating "sympathy" with "attention" in this context is pretty defensible if you think in terms of connotation and not just denotation, and even if it weren't, it's not much of a stretch compared to the vast leaps of assumption made by others in the thread
Kolya on 26/11/2009 at 12:31
Oh okay great, just wasn't sure. :)
Can we discuss what happened to the members of the Manson family now?
I've subtly tried to steer the thread this way but I think I need to be more outspoken.
