Hypothesis: No Hamas = No More Problems. For anyone. - by SubJeff
Jokerman on 2/6/2010 at 14:54
Quote Posted by hopper
Oh yeah, trust YouTube to tell it like it is.
Yep, you should not believe your lying eyes
Fragony on 2/6/2010 at 15:07
I never said he orchestrated it, but you could ask yourself why these ships were allowed to leave as the known purpose was to breach a sea-block. Turkish goverment can cry foul all they want.
edit lol peace activists with kevlar and night-goggles, as well as IHH members, and one Dutch Hamas fundraiser. 40 Yet to be identified but some people are very interested. Looks like my sources were correct and no they don't blog so no link.
Matthew on 2/6/2010 at 15:49
Hold on, 'why these ships were allowed to leave'? Most nations don't take it upon themselves to stop merchant vessels leaving port, you know.
Edit: also, that's the first time I've ever heard kevlar or NVGs mentioned at all, even by the Israelis.
Fragony on 2/6/2010 at 16:09
It's purpose was clear and Turkey didnt act, ask your local Kurd what it looks like when Turkey acts. They would never accidently endanger their relation with Israel and most certainly won't allow it they have basements for that.
Yes kevlar, you heard it here first how awesome is that, it's going to get a lot better trust me.
SubJeff on 2/6/2010 at 16:34
Quote Posted by Namdrol
Fragony, do you think it's any coincidence that Subjeff shut up once he realised you had his back in this thread?
Some of us go to work you know!
But although Fraggers and I may agree on some things this whole "Turkish orchestration" isn't my bag.
Quote Posted by Rug Burn Junky
It takes a very special kind of self delusion to convince oneself that Israel is somehow the victim of a "PR stunt" or "liberal agenda" in this instance.
Shall I put it another way then? The plan to run the blockade was primarily to highlight the plight of Gazans to the world, again, because they new there would be some political fallout. They may not have expected that people would die but they were prepared for it and we know this not from the Israelis or any other biased source, but because they announced this before they left port to independent, nay sympathetic media outlets.
Fragony on 2/6/2010 at 17:00
I haz cautiously lovin yet taunting variation on nick yay I am a rising star. But I still didn't say orchestrated. Make it 'allow it to get out of hand for political purpose' then yes.
DDL on 2/6/2010 at 17:06
So we're at least agreed that the gazans are, in fact, in a plight worthy of attention? And that this plight is because they're surrounded by angry israelis who totally control what they have access to?
Don't get me wrong, Hamas pulls some serious dickmoves, but this is like watching a small child being locked in a bare room, denied food or clothing and being subjected to baseball bat hits by a big angry man, and then criticizing the child for hitting below the belt whenever he gets the opportunity.
*Zaccheus* on 2/6/2010 at 17:14
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
From Gaza they are, and if anyone else does it's either with their permission or some small splinter group.
Did you miss this?
Quote Posted by *Zaccheus*
... the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades (i.e. Fatah) have also been firing rockets:
Quote:
A previously unknown group, Ansar al-Sunna, believed to share the hardline ideology of al Qaeda, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire at Israel,
as well as the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, a wing of the mainstream Fatah movement.
(
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62H1I520100319)
Rug Burn Junky on 2/6/2010 at 17:15
Oh fuck off, are you really that retarded? Just because there are other poor deluded souls - SOME OF WHOM ARE CAPABLE OF ADDING SUBTITLES TO VIDEOS OHMIGOSH - doesn't give any more credence to your delusions. Just because some idiot with a commodore 64 can slap some words over grainy footage doesn't make his dubious interpretive skills any more credible, and you should fucking slap yourself for even thinking that this is a citation worth mentioning. Even if I gave you the full benefit of the doubt - a stretch given your meager cognitive capabilities - and took all of the claims made in that video as true, it STILL doesn't justify Israel's actions blamelessly. That's with all of the assumptions favorable to you. But back here in reality, where that video is obviously the product of the fever dreams of an apologist desperate not to admit that it's more complicated than his lego-constructed view of the world, the case is much murkier, and that makes your attempt to paint me as biased even more of a fuckin' joke.
The simple fact is that one
could theoretically make the argument with a straight face that israel is justified in acting so unapologetically aggressive: "Yeah, we're assholes, and we know we're wrong, but we don't care and we're not going to take it any more."
BUt that's not what I'm hearing, either here or elsewhere. There's a sense of victimhood that pervades all of the justifications. As though Israel not only had a right to do it (questionable, at best) but had no other choice, and deserve
sympathy for being mistreated here.... I mean, what the fuck?
No. No they don't.
They were unquestionably aggressive, to ignore that is a delusion bordering on the pathological. There were plenty of opportunities to make decisions that would not have put them in the position of having to defend their actions.
To claim that it is a PR stunt ignores the fact that they had a choice not to enact a questionable blockade in the first place. If they don't, this situation never happens.
To claim that it is a PR stunt ignores the fact that they chose to enforce the blockade with military tactics destined to devolve into violence. If they don't, this situation never happens.
The Israelis had choices, they took them. They can't blame others for their own aggressive, wrongheaded decisions and actions. Nobody put them in this situation but themselves. It's not as though Hamas maneuvered them into actions that they simply couldn't avoid due to amazing genius, chess-like moves and jedi mind tricks. Israel played a giant game of chicken, daring Hamas and their sympathizers to run the blockade, and when someone actually DOES, it's beyond disingenuous to claim innocence and act shocked - shocked I tell you - that anyone would dare do such a thing.
Trying to divest Israel of any responsibility for their actions ignores reality. There is blame a plenty on both sides for both the micro and macro situation, and plenty of that shit deservedly flows back on Bibi and the current hawklike israeli government, which is simply itching for a fight, consequences be damned.
This is not bias, nor is it ignorance. I'm fully aware of the less than innocent motives and actions of Hamas, but where you display ignorance is thinking that that somehow absolves Israel of responsibility when they have so clearly fucked up. Unless you can acknowledge this simple reality, you are quite frankly the plainly ignorant one here.
You can choose to confront facts and challenge your own opinions, or you can retreat to that self defense mechanism of claiming that only bias drives those who are calling you a fucktard (and yes, I am indeed calling you a fucktard). You've obviously chosen the latter. It is ironic that you attempt to defend your own bias and ignorance through accusations of the same, but not surprising.
So in short: shut the fuck up, your special ed version of link-to-youtube-debate is embarrassing, and you're not doing anything but displaying your own giant blind spot.
----------------------------------------------------------
And to Brian the Dog (and others), while I'm flattered that everyone cites to me as the expert on all things legal, give demagogue some love. When it comes to areas of international law, he's the man and can no doubt run laps around me. He's not a self promoter, but he knows his shit and I defer to him completely. If you want to finance a multi billion dollar cross border power plant through a debt/equity hybrid, I can help. Anything else that's international is his bag and we should all listen raptly when he speaks.
Rug Burn Junky on 2/6/2010 at 17:23
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
Shall I put it another way then? The plan to run the blockade was primarily to highlight the plight of Gazans to the world, again, because they new there would be some political fallout. They may not have expected that people would die but they were prepared for it and we know this not from the Israelis or any other biased source, but because they announced this before they left port to independent, nay sympathetic media outlets.
Even if this is all true, I ask: "So fucking what?" It still doesn't justify anything that Israel has done. They created the situation and pushed the response.
The only reason that there is political fall-out at all and it worked to any extent to highlight their plight is because of the irrational nature of the israeli response. The fact that the blockade runners recognized ahead of time that Israel would overreact only means that Israel is predictable, not that they were justified.