Para?noid on 9/10/2006 at 16:00
damn son viginti tres is over 5 minutes long
the artifacting produced by timestretching a 7 second sample to 5 minutes would be so obvious it would be unreal
stop reading into this shit music so much jeez
Scots Taffer on 9/10/2006 at 23:17
Didn't he say it was compressing 5 minutes to 7 seconds and not what you said?
And noid the tool hater is quite a different beast to noid the tool lover.
ercles on 9/10/2006 at 23:29
Many tool lovers are 10, 000 days haters. And I thought what he was suggesting that if Tool actually did create a song by making a seven second secret message then spread it out to five minutes, it would have been painfully obvious.
Shug on 10/10/2006 at 02:17
Quote Posted by Para?noid
damn son viginti tres is over 5 minutes long
the artifacting produced by timestretching a 7 second sample to 5 minutes would be so obvious it would be unreal
stop reading into this shit music so much jeez
given your status as unconquerable music genius you should be telling me how they did it, rather than shitting on his request and subsequent posts to discover the kind of things you were masturbating over when tool released aenima
shame on you
they've had years to work on this shit, it's clearly not as simplistic as recording a 5-7 second voice clip, distorting it, then reversing and stretching it; but given a predisposition for messages of all kinds in their work, and the fact that three of the tracks appear to be designed to layer over each other, I don't find it such a stretch that some kind of interesting tidbit was hidden by a song that is otherwise windmill sounds with a strange yelling noise at the end
Tocky on 11/10/2006 at 11:44
I wonder what hidden message was in Autechres Confield? It must have been something besides 20 minutes of pissing on a tin plate.
I've learned not to take peoples musical opinions too seriously here.
Schattentänzer on 11/10/2006 at 13:22
Quote Posted by Shug
Additionally, I've discovered a small clip which is Vigintri Tres flipped around and compressed to 7 seconds, which sounds suspiciously like a distorted voice. If you have a few listens you can make up your own mind as to what it says
Quote Posted by Shug
[tell] me how they did it
1. Shrink song
a) Speed it up
b) Resample it
2. Reverse song
3.
FMAM a voice to it
That's just a guess, but it's a rather trivial process. Think of a vocoder. If you re-stretch it to normal length again you'd hardly notice the voice modulated into it.
Quote Posted by Tocky
I wonder what hidden message was in Autechres Confield? It must have been something besides 20 minutes of pissing on a tin plate.
I actually prefer Confield over LP5. It's an album which depends heavily on mood though.
Oh, and I don't know anything as stuffed with hidden shit as Geogaddi.
Para?noid on 11/10/2006 at 17:41
Quote Posted by Scots_Taffer
Didn't he say it was compressing 5 minutes to 7 seconds and not what you said?
And noid the tool hater is quite a different beast to noid the tool lover.
hurrr
You take the sample you want hidden, THEN timestretch it. That's why, when you compress the track, you hear the original sample christ man get a grip
Anyway that's not what they did so give it a rest and go home children
newphase on 11/10/2006 at 22:41
John Prescott managing to get a shag from someone other than his wife - now THATS scary :p
Turtle on 11/10/2006 at 22:46
Did you know that you're allowed to read threads and not comment on them?
newphase on 11/10/2006 at 22:55
nope - thats news to me :joke:
