Turtle on 18/3/2005 at 16:57
No no, you misunderstand.
There are no groups that <i>you</i> may become a member of.
Starrfall on 18/3/2005 at 18:51
Quote Posted by Dark Arrow
So different groups could have priviledges over the others?
Hmm... What about images? Have you considered using group memberships against spambots.
I think they have this group set up where people who are in it can't post or anything. It's called "banned" or something like that.
SubJeff on 18/3/2005 at 20:07
We should totally have groups. Like little gangs. Then when a flame war starts for no reason (I mean if, cuz you know, never happens) you can call in the gang. Or like a gang can owe you for favours. Like one time you backed them up in a flame war or you sent them an FM CD cuz they are on ghey dialup.
ignatios on 18/3/2005 at 20:14
Quote Posted by Starrfall
I think they have this group set up where people who are in it can't post or anything. It's called "banned" or something like that.
Most commonly known as 'the band'
Gingerbread Man on 18/3/2005 at 22:00
There are a couple of groups I would implement, but I doubt anyone would find them flattering.
¬¬
SubJeff on 18/3/2005 at 22:26
Do it. Do it.
Ulukai on 19/3/2005 at 00:57
Quote Posted by ignatios
Most commonly known as 'the band'
Excellent, Now there's a whole new meaning to, "This one time, at band camp"
Gingerbread Man on 19/3/2005 at 01:54
Bah... You can wander in the Gulag, you should know we've come up with MUCH better titles :D
ignatios on 19/3/2005 at 03:27
GIVE ME THE GULAG
I WILL GIVE YOU TITTIES
TITLES
¬¬
( o Y o )
Salvage on 19/3/2005 at 14:56
That spambot idea looks pretty good. Simply disallow any html or potentially bad bbcode to users who have less than 25 posts. This should give enough time for the bots to be caught and banned.